Acta Med. 2024, 67: 26-31
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2024.16
The Role of Digital Facebow for CAD/CAM Implant-Supported Crowns Workflow
Lenka Vavřičkováa,b
, Martin Kapitána,b, Jan Schmidta,b
, Martin Kapitána,b, Jan Schmidta,b
aDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Czech Republic
bDepartment of Dentistry, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
Received September 18, 2023
Accepted March 29, 2024
References
1. K, Murata Y, Nagaoka K, Akiyama S, Hokii Y, Fusejima F. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of lithium disilicate CAD/CAM ceramics. J Osseointegration 2022; 14: 205–8.
2. WS, Lee DH, Lee KB. Evaluation of internal fit of interim crown fabricated with CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing system. J Adv Prosthodont 2017; 9: 265–70.
<https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.265>
<PubMed>
3. R, Gonzalo E, Gomez-Polo M, Lopez-Suarez C, Suarez MJ. SEM evaluation of the precision of fit of CAD/CAM zirconia and metal-ceramic posterior crowns. Dent Mater J 2017; 36: 387–93.
<https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-305>
4. Z, Harvan Ľ, Jurásková Sedlatá E, Eber M. Contribution of the digital facebow and individually programmed articulator in removable complete dentures. Prakt zub lék 2015; 63: 3–9.
<https://doi.org/10.51479/cspzl.2015.018>
5. The glossary of the prosthodontics terms. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 117(5S): e1–e105.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.001>
6. WW, Goldstein GR. Facebow use in clinical prosthodontic practice. J Prosthodont 2019; 28: 772–4.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12944>
7. A. The determination of the terminal hinge axis: a fundamental review and comparison of known and novel methods. Int J Comput Dent 2018; 21: 201–14.
8. A, Naeije M. Location of the hinge axis and the kinematic centre in asymptomatic and clicking temporomandibular joints. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 661–5.
<https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00441.x>
9. WW, Smithy TJ, Wirth CG. Accuracy of a predetermined transverse horizontal mandibular axis point. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 387–94.
<https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.123351>
10. S, Rehan S, Palaskar J, Mittal S. Hinge axis-location, clinical use and controversies. J Res Dent 2017; 4: 158–61.
<https://doi.org/10.19177/jrd.v4e62016158-161>
11. S, Kraljević Šimunković S, et al. Articulator-related registration and analysis of sagittal condylar inclination. Acta Clin Croat 2015; 54: 432–7.
12. K, Ćelić R, Ćimić S, Dulčić N. Comparison of Parameters for Programming Adjustable Dental Articulators by Using Wax Eccentric Records and Arcus Digma Device. Acta Stomatol Croat 2019; 53: 213–23.
<https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/3/3>
<PubMed>
13. E, Spera E, Ottria L, et al. Bennett movement of mandible: a comparison between traditional methods and a 64-slices CT scanner. Oral Implantol 2008; 1: 15.
14. W, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, Kwon HB. Occlusal consequence of using average condylar guidance settings: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 117: 532–8.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.014>
15. MT, Abdullah Mously H, Khalid Alamoudi S, Hossam Hashem AB, Hussein Naguib G. A Systematic Review of Screw versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant Supported Reconstructions. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2020; 12: 9–16.
<https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S231070>
<PubMed>
16. A, Drafta S, Oancea L. A new technique to transfer the upper maxillary arch position using a facebow, a transfer table, and a reference block with a CAD application. J Prosthodont 2024 Feb; 33(2): 195–200.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13703>
17. E, Garmendia A, Minguez R, Brizuela A, Pradies G. Virtual facebow technique. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 751–5.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.012>
18. A, Drafta S, Stefanescu C, Oancea, L. Virtual facebow technique using standardized background images. J Prosthet Dent 2019; 121: 724–8.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.07.008>
19. JC, Kois DE, Zeitler JM, Martin J. Digital to analog facially generated interchangeable facebow transfer: capturing a standardized reference position. J Prosthodont 2022; 31(Suppl 1): 13–22.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13437>
20. J, Chen Z, Decker AM, Wang HL, Joda T, Mendonca G, Lepidi L. Trueness and precision of economical smartphone‐based virtual facebow records. J Prosthodont 2022; 31: 22–9.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13366>
<PubMed>
21. JH, Lee GH, Moon DN, Kim JC, Park M, Lee KM. A digital approach to the evaluation of mandibular position by using a virtual articulator. J Prosthet Dent 2021; 125: 849–53.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.002>
22. S, Dong B, Zhang Q, Li J, Yuan Q, Yue L. An indirect digital technique to transfer 3D printed casts to a mechanical articulator with individual sagittal condylar inclination settings using CBCT and intraoral scans. J Prosthodont 2022; 3: 822–7.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13570>
23. L, Galli M, Mastrangelo F, Venezia P, Joda T, Wang HL, Li J. Virtual articulators and virtual mounting procedures: where do we stand? J Prosthodont 2021; 30: 24–35.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13240>
24. JE, Kim SJ, Kwon DH, Shim JS, Kim JH. Mounting casts on a mechanical articulator by using digital multisource data: A dental technique. J Prosthet Dent 2021; 125: 41–5.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.10.022>
