Acta Med. 2023, 66: 24-27
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2023.11
The Sex Ratio at Birth Is Higher in Māori than in Non-Māori Populations in Aotearoa New Zealand
References
1. V, Mamo J. What is the sex ratio at birth? Early Hum Dev 2020; 140.
2. WH, Grech V. A review of the established and suspected causes of variations in human sex ratio at birth. Early Hum Dev 2017; 109: 50–6.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.03.002>
3. M, Fukuda K, Shimizu T, Moller H. Decline in sex ratio at birth after Kobe earthquake. Hum Reprod 1998; 13(8): 2321–2.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.8.2321>
4. WR. Altered sex ratio after the London smog of 1952 and the Brisbane flood of 1965. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1974; 81(8): 626–31.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1974.tb00529.x>
5. G, O’Neill SM, Khashan AS, Kenny LC, Grech V. The Terrorist Attacks and the Human Live Birth Sex Ratio: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Acta Medica (Hradec Kral) 2017; 60(2): 59–65.
6. RA. Sex ratios in the two Germanies: a test of the economic stress hypothesis. Hum Reprod 2003; 18(9): 1972–5.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg370>
7. PM. Sex ratio at birth in territories with a relatively complete registration. Biodemography Soc Biol 1967; 14(2): 132–142.
8. V. State and regional differences in the male-to-female ratio at birth in the United States, 1995–2012. . West Indian Med J 2015; 65(1): 180–4.
9. CR, McKeown T. The sex ratio of human births related to maternal age. Br J Soc Med 1950; 4(2): 75–85.
10. Statistics New Zealand. New Zealand in Profile: An Overview of New Zealand’s People, Economy, and Environment, 2009.
11. SC, Gray H, Huria T, Lacey C, Beckert L, Pitama SG. Reported Māori consumer experiences of health systems and programs in qualitative research: a systematic review with meta-synthesis. Int J Equity Health 2019; 18(1): 163.
<https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1057-4>
<PubMed>
12. C, Ekeroma A. Covid-19 outbreak reflects inequities in health and socioeconomic disadvantage in Aotearoa/New Zealand and the Pacific Islands. Pac Health Dialog 2021; 21(8): 475–6.
<https://doi.org/10.26635/phd.2021.124>
13. R, Lawrenson R, Kidd J, et al. Inequalities between Māori and non-Māori men with prostate cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand. N Z Med J 2020; 133(1521): 69–76.
14. K. Maori/non-Maori alcohol consumption profiles: implications for reducing health inequalities. N Z Med J 2003; 116(1184): U643.
15. Marriott L, Sim D. Indicators of inequality for Maori and Pacific people. J New Zeal Stud 2015; (20): 24–50. https://search.informit.org /doi/10.3316/informit.276927349255099
<https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.276927349255099>
16. Statistics New Zealand Tatauranga Aotearoa. Browse – Infoshare. Accessed June 3, 2022. https://infoshare.stats.govt.nz/infoshare/default.aspx?RedirectReason = session_expired
17. Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, 1981.
18. V. WASP–Write a Scientific Paper course: why and how. J Vis Commun Med 2017; 40(3): 130–4.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/17453054.2017.1366825>
19. T, Dunbar RIM. Female-biased reproductive strategies in a Hungarian Gypsy population. Proc R Soc London Ser B Biol Sci 1997; 264(1378): 17–22.
<https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1997.0003>
20. SJC, Robbins CJ. Trivers-Willard effect in contemporary North American society. Am J Phys Anthropol 1991; 85(1): 61–9.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330850108>
21. L. Preferential parental investment in daughters over sons. Hum Nat 1991; 2(4): 387–417.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692198>
22. V. Evidence of socio-economic stress and female foeticide in racial disparities in the gender ratio at birth in the United States (1995–2014). Early Hum Dev 2017; 106–107: 63–5.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.02.003>
23. V. Evidence of economic deprivation and female foeticide in a United Nations global births by gender data set. Early Hum Dev 2015; 91(12): 855–8.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.10.013>
24. V. A socio-economic hypothesis for lower birth sex ratios at racial, national and global levels. Early Hum Dev 2018; 116: 81–3.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.11.008>
25. RL, Willard DE. Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 1973; 179(4068): 90–2.
<https://doi.org/10.1126/science.179.4068.90>
26. V, Mamo J. Secular trends and latitude gradients in sex ratios at birth in Australia and New Zealand (1950–2010) demonstrate uncharacteristic homogeneity. Malta Med J 2013; 25(3): 25–7.
27. J, Vatten L, Eskild A. The human sex ratio: effects of maternal age. Hum Reprod 2012; 27(1): 283–7.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der347>
28. TJ, Hamilton BE. Trend analysis of the sex ratio at birth in the United States. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2005; 53(20): 1–17.
29. K, Ushioda N, Udoff LC. Parental aging synergistically decreases offspring sex ratio. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2009; 35(1): 164–8.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00836.x>
30. RA, Bruckner T, Anderson E, Gould JB. Fetal death sex ratios: a test of the economic stress hypothesis. Int J Epidemiol 2005; 34(4): 944–8.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyi081>
31. D. A review of environmental and occupational toxins in relation to sex ratio at birth. Early Hum Dev 2020; 141: 104873.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.104873>
32. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Natality Information, Live Births. Published 2017. Accessed May 20, 2022. https://wonder.cdc.gov/natality.html
33. V, Gatt M, Mamo J, Calleja N. Maternal factors and the male to female birth ratio in Malta. Malta Med Sch Gaz 2017; 1(2): 39–40.
