Acta Med. 2022, 65: 99-104

https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2022.25

Are Digital Methods Sufficiently Successful in Colour Determination for Monolithic All-Ceramic Crowns?

Lenka Vavřičková, Martin Kapitán, Eliška Charlotte Wurfel

Department of Dentistry, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Czech Republic

Received March 7, 2022
Accepted December 8, 2022

References

1. Baldwin DC. Appearance and esthetics in oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1980; 8: 224–56. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1980.tb01296.x>
2. Corcodel N, Helling S, Rammelsberg P, Hassel AJ. Metameric effect between natural teeth and shade tabs of a shade guide. Eur J Oral Sci 2010; 118: 311–6. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00730.x>
3. Van der Burgt TP, Ten Bosch JJ, BorsboomPCF, Kortsmit WJPM. A comparison of new and conventional method for quantification of tooth color. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 155–62. <https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90099-X>
4. Dozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, El-Zohairy A, Feilzer AJ, Khashayar G. Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices. J Prosthodont 2007; 16: 93–100. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00163.x>
5. Haddad HJ, Jakstat HA, Arnetzl G, et al. Does gender and expirience influenceshade matching quality? J Dent 2009; 37: e40–44. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.012>
6. Fondriest J. Shade matching in restorative dentistry: the science and strategies. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23: 467–79.
7. Yu B, Lee YK. Colour difference of all-ceramic materials by the change of illuminants. Am J Dent 2009; 22: 73–8.
8. Goodkind RJ, Keenan K, Schwabacher WB. Use of fiberoptic colorimeter for an in vivo color measurement of 2830 anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 58: 535-542. <https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90380-5>
9. Zhao Y, Zhu J. In vivo color measurement of 410 maxillary anterior teeth. Chin J Dent Res 1998; 3: 49–51.
10. Jahangiri L, Reinhardt SB, Mehra RV, Matheson PB. Relationship between tooth shade value and skin colour: an observational study. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 149–52. <https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.121109>
11. Joiner A. Tooth color: a review of the literature. J Dent 2004; 32: 3–12. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2003.10.013>
12. McLaren EA, Schoenbaum T. Combine conventional and digital methods to maximize shade matching. Inside Dental Assisting 2012; 8: 2.
13. Jurim B, Jurim A. A review of intraoralscanning technology. Inside Dental Technology 2019; 10: 9.
14. Czigola A, Roth I, Vitai V, Feher D, Hermann P, Borbely J. Comparing the effectiveness of shade measurement by intraoral scanner, digital spectrophotometer, and visual shade assesment. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021; 33: 1166–74. <https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12810>
15. Borse S, Chavare SH. Tooth shade analysis and selection in prosthodontic. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2020; 20: 131–40.
16. Paravina RD. Performance assesment of dental shade guides. J Dent 2009; 37: e15–20. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.02.005>
17. Brandt J, Nelson S, Lauer HC, von Hehn U, Brandt S. In vivo studyfor tooth colour determination-visual versus digital. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21: 2863–71. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2088-0>
18. Blum SL, Horn M, Olms C. A comparison of intraoral spectrophotometers-Are there user specific differences? J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30: 442–8. <https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12407>
19. Liberato WF, Barreto IC, Costa PP, Costa de Ameida C, Pimentel W, Tiossi R. A comparison between v sual, itraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2019; 121: 271–5. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.004>
20. Yilmaz B, Irmak O. Outcomes of visual tooth shade selection performed by operators with different expirience. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019; 31: 500–7. <https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12507>
21. Rutkunas V, Dirse J, Bilius V. Accuracy of an intraoral digital scanner in tooth color determination. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 123: 322–9. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.020>
22. Reyes J, Acosta P, Ventura D. Repeatability of the human eye compared to an intraoral scanner in dental shade matching. Helion 2019; 5: e02100. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02100> <PubMed>
23. Tabatabaian F, Beyabanaki E, Alirezaei P, Epakchi S. Visual and digital tooth shade selection methods, related effective factors and conditions, and their accuracy and precision: A literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021; 33: 1084–104. <https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12816>
24. Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent 2010; 2, e2–16. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.001>
25. Pop-ciutrila IS, Dudea D, Eugenia Badea M, Moldovan M, Cimpean SI, Ghinea R. Shade correspondence, color, and translucency differences between human dentine and CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic system. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016; 28: 46–55. <https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12195>
front cover

ISSN 1211-4286 (Print) ISSN 1805-9694 (Online)

Open access journal

Archive