Acta Med. 2022, 65: 59-65
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2022.19
An Investigation of the Accuracy and Reproducibility of 3D Printed Transparent Endodontic Blocks
References
1. ID, Ertas H, Ok E, Arslan H, Ertas ET. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. J Endod 2014; 40(6): 852–6.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.010>
2. S, Cortes O, Garcia C, Perez L. Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008; 32(4): 295–8.
<https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.32.4.l57l36355u606576>
3. S, Machtou P, Tomson P, Adams N, Lumley P. Influence of fractured instruments on the success rate of endodontic treatment. Dent Update 2008; 35(3): 172–4, 176, 178–9.
<https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2008.35.3.172>
4. A, Kim HC, Lee W, Kim BM, Lee CJ. Flexural stiffness and stresses in nickel-titanium rotary files for various pitch and cross-sectional geometries. J Endod 2012; 38(10): 1399–403.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.008>
5. TB, Mitchell JC, Baumgartner JC. Effect of electropolishing ProFile nickel-titanium rotary instruments on cyclic fatigue resistance, torsional resistance, and cutting efficiency. J Endod 2008; 34(2): 190–3.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.10.007>
6. S, Grande NM, Plotino G, et al. Influence of environmental temperature, heat-treatment and design on the cyclic fatigue resistance of three generations of a single-file nickel-titanium rotary instrument. Odontology 2019; 107(3): 301–7.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0399-5>
7. A, Roohi N, Zayeri F. A comparative study of four rotary NiTi instruments in preserving canal curvature, preparation time and change of working length. Australian Endodontic Journal 2009; 35(2): 93–7.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2008.00135.x>
8. SM, Zayet MK, Hamouda IM. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of curved root canals after mechanical preparation with three nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Biomed Res 2013; 27(4): 326–35.
9. G, Maden M, Savgat A, Orhan H. Shaping ability of the profile 25/0.06 and protaper F2 in rotary motion, and reciproc in simulated canals. PeerJ 2018; 6:e6109.
<https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6109>
<PubMed>
10. KT, Kamaci A, Taner M, Erdilek N, Celik D. Shaping ability of two M-wire and two traditional nickel-titanium instrumentation systems in S-shaped resin canals. Niger J Clin Pract 2015; 18(6): 713.
<https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.163294>
11. R, Pröhl AK, Lang H, Pahncke D. Comparison of the shaping ability of GT® Series X, Twisted Files and AlphaKite rotary nickel-titanium systems in simulated canals. BMC Oral Health 2013; 13: 72.
<https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-13-72>
<PubMed>
12. PMH, Alodeh MHA, Al-Omari MAO. A method for the construction of simulated root canals in clear resin blocks. Int Endod J 1991; 24(2): 63–6.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1991.tb00809.x>
13. RC, Fensterseifer M, Peters OA, de Figueiredo J a. P, Gomes MS, Rossi-Fedele G. Methods for measurement of root canal curvature: a systematic and critical review. Int Endod J 2019; 52(2): 169–80.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12996>
14. S, Brago A, Howijieh A, Barakat H, Kozlova Y, Baykulova M. Evaluation of Cross-Sectional Root Canal Shape and Presentation of New Classification of Its Changes Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scanning. Appl Sci 2020; 10(13): 4495.
<https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134495>
15. CD, Szabó J, Szabó J. A mathematically based classification of root canal curvatures on natural human teeth. J Endod 1995; 21(11): 557–60.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80985-4>
16. G, Dioguardi M, Cocco A, Zhurakivska K, Ciavarella D, Muzio LL. Increase the glyde path diameter improves the centering ability of F6 Skytaper. Eur J Dent 2018; 12(1): 89–93.
17. D, Bartols A, Faheem MK, Schroeter D, Groessner-Schreiber B, Doerfer CE. Shaping ability of four root canal instrumentation systems in simulated 3D-printed root canal models. PLOS ONE 2018; 13(8): e0201129.
<https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201129>
<PubMed>
18. WKM, Thong YL. Construction Of Standardised Simulated Root Canals In Resin Blocks For Pre-clinical Teaching. Ann Dent UM 2002; 9(1): 7–10.
<https://doi.org/10.22452/adum.vol9no1.2>
19. Coward C. 3D Printing. New York (US) Penguin Group; 2015: 74.
20. C, Demiral M, Sarıyılmaz E. Comparison of the shaping ability of novel thermally treated reciprocating instruments. Restor Dent Endod 2018; 43(2): e15.
<https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e15>
<PubMed>
21. K, Vo CQ. A new method for assessment of nickel-titanium endodontic instrument surface roughness using field emission scanning electronic microscope. BMC Oral Health 2020; 20(1): 240.
<https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01233-0>
<PubMed>
22. G, İnan U. Effect of glide path preparation with PathFile and ProGlider on the cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne nickel-titanium files. Restor Dent Endod 2019; 44(2): e22.
<https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e22>
<PubMed>
23. PS, Chavan KM, Rathi RS, Tambe VH, Lokhande N, Kapse BS. Radiographic evaluation of root canal curvature in mesiobuccal canals of mandibular molars by different methods and its correlation with canal access angle in curved canals: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2019; 22(5): 425–9.
24. EJNL, Muniz BL, Pires F, et al. Comparison of canal transportation in simulated curved canals prepared with ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold systems. Restor Dent Endod 2016; 41(1): 1–5.
<https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.1.1>
<PubMed>
25. M, Dahan S, Machtou P. Centering Ability and Influence of Experience When Using WaveOne Single-File Technique in Simulated Canals. Int J Dent 2012; 2012: e206321.
26. A, Eliopoulos D, Kontakiotis E. Root canal transportation with a Ni-Ti rotary file system and stainless steel hand files in simulated root canals. Quintessence Int 2006; 37(5): 369–74.
