Acta Med. 2021, 64: 108-118

https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2021.19

Rasch Validation of the LVQOL Scale

Ioanna MylonaaID, Vassilis Aletrasb, Nikolaos Ziakasa, Ioannis Tsinopoulosa

a2nd Department of Ophthalmology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
bDepartment of Business Administration, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece

Received December 13, 2020
Accepted April 13, 2021

References

1. Wolffsohn JS, Cochrane AL. Design of the low vision quality-of-life questionnaire (LVQOL) and measuring the outcome of low-vision rehabilitation. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 130: 793–802. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00610-3>
2. de Boer MR, Terwee CB, de Vet HC, Moll AC, Völker-Dieben HJ, van Rens GH. Evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires: the LVQOL and VCM1. Qual Life Res 2006; 15: 233–48 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1524-9>
3. Pérez-Mañá L, Cardona G, Pardo Cladellas Y, Pérez-Mañá C, Wolffsohn JS, Antón A. Translation and cultural adaptation into Spanish of the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2019; 94: 384–90. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftal.2019.02.004>
4. Zou HD, Zhang X, Xu X, Bai L. Development and evaluation of psychometric tests of the Chinese-version of low vision quality of life questionnaire. Chin J Ophthalmol 2005; 41: 246–51.
5. Yingyong P. Evaluation of the thai, low vision quality-of-life questionnaire (LVQOL). J Med Assoc Thai 2007; 90: 2658.
6. Kim JT, Moon NJ. Research on the quality of life of low vision patients. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2007; 48: 1269–75. <https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2007.48.9.1269>
7. Do AT, Ilango K, Ramasamy D, Kalidasan S, Balakrishnan V, Chang RT. Effectiveness of low vision services in improving patient quality of life at Aravind Eye Hospital. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014; 62: 1125–31.
8. De Boer MR, Moll AC, De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Völker‐Dieben HJ, Van Rens GH. Psychometric properties of vision‐related quality of life questionnaires: a systematic review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004; 24: 257–73. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00187.x>
9. Kean J, Brodke DS, Biber J, Gross P. An introduction to Item Response Theory and Rasch Analysis of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Brain Impair 2018; 19: 91–102. <https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2017.31> <PubMed>
10. Bond T. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. London: Routledge, 2015.
11. Khadka J, McAlinden C, Pesudovs K. Quality assessment of ophthalmic questionnaires: review and recommendations. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: 720–44. <https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000001>
12. van Nispen RM, Knol DL, Langelaan M, van Rens GH. Re-evaluating a vision-related quality of life questionnaire with item response theory (IRT) and differential item functioning (DIF) analyses. BMC Medical Res Methodol 2011; 11: 125. <https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-125> <PubMed>
13. Linacre JM. Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com, 2021.
14. Linacre JM. Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program User’s Guide. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com, 2021.
15. Boone WJ, Staver JR, Yale MS. Rasch analysis in the human sciences. New York: Springer, 2013
16. Duncan PW, Bode RK, Lai SM, Perera S, Investigators GAiNA. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 950–63. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00035-2>
17. Linacre JM, Wright FD, Wright B, Linacre J. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas Trans 1994; 8: 370.
18. Khadka J, Gothwal VK, McAlinden C, Lamoureux EL, Pesudovs K. The importance of rating scales in measuring patient-reported outcomes. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012; 10: 80. <https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-10-80> <PubMed>
19. Boone WJ. Rasch Analysis for Instrument Development: Why, When, and How? CBE Life Sci Educ 2016; 15: rm4. <https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148> <PubMed>
20. Fisher WP. Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Rasch Meas Trans 2007; 21: 1095.
21. Sii SSZ, Chean CS, Sandland-Taylor LE, Anuforom U, Patel D, Le GT, Khan AJ. Impact of COVID-19 on cataract surgery- patients’ perceptions while waiting for cataract surgery and their willingness to attend hospital for cataract surgery during the easing of lockdown period. Eye 2020; 22: 1–3.
front cover

ISSN 1211-4286 (Print) ISSN 1805-9694 (Online)

Open access journal

Archive