Acta Med. 2021, 64: 108-118
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2021.19
Rasch Validation of the LVQOL Scale
References
1. JS, Cochrane AL. Design of the low vision quality-of-life questionnaire (LVQOL) and measuring the outcome of low-vision rehabilitation. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 130: 793–802.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00610-3>
2. MR, Terwee CB, de Vet HC, Moll AC, Völker-Dieben HJ, van Rens GH. Evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires: the LVQOL and VCM1. Qual Life Res 2006; 15: 233–48
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1524-9>
3. L, Cardona G, Pardo Cladellas Y, Pérez-Mañá C, Wolffsohn JS, Antón A. Translation and cultural adaptation into Spanish of the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2019; 94: 384–90.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftal.2019.02.004>
4. HD, Zhang X, Xu X, Bai L. Development and evaluation of psychometric tests of the Chinese-version of low vision quality of life questionnaire. Chin J Ophthalmol 2005; 41: 246–51.
5. P. Evaluation of the thai, low vision quality-of-life questionnaire (LVQOL). J Med Assoc Thai 2007; 90: 2658.
6. JT, Moon NJ. Research on the quality of life of low vision patients. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2007; 48: 1269–75.
<https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2007.48.9.1269>
7. AT, Ilango K, Ramasamy D, Kalidasan S, Balakrishnan V, Chang RT. Effectiveness of low vision services in improving patient quality of life at Aravind Eye Hospital. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014; 62: 1125–31.
8. MR, Moll AC, De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Völker‐Dieben HJ, Van Rens GH. Psychometric properties of vision‐related quality of life questionnaires: a systematic review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004; 24: 257–73.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00187.x>
9. J, Brodke DS, Biber J, Gross P. An introduction to Item Response Theory and Rasch Analysis of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Brain Impair 2018; 19: 91–102.
<https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2017.31>
<PubMed>
10. Bond T. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. London: Routledge, 2015.
11. J, McAlinden C, Pesudovs K. Quality assessment of ophthalmic questionnaires: review and recommendations. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: 720–44.
<https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000001>
12. RM, Knol DL, Langelaan M, van Rens GH. Re-evaluating a vision-related quality of life questionnaire with item response theory (IRT) and differential item functioning (DIF) analyses. BMC Medical Res Methodol 2011; 11: 125.
<https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-125>
<PubMed>
13. Linacre JM. Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com, 2021.
14. Linacre JM. Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program User’s Guide. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com, 2021.
15. Boone WJ, Staver JR, Yale MS. Rasch analysis in the human sciences. New York: Springer, 2013
16. PW, Bode RK, Lai SM, Perera S, Investigators GAiNA. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 950–63.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00035-2>
17. JM, Wright FD, Wright B, Linacre J. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas Trans 1994; 8: 370.
18. J, Gothwal VK, McAlinden C, Lamoureux EL, Pesudovs K. The importance of rating scales in measuring patient-reported outcomes. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012; 10: 80.
<https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-10-80>
<PubMed>
19. WJ. Rasch Analysis for Instrument Development: Why, When, and How? CBE Life Sci Educ 2016; 15: rm4.
<https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148>
<PubMed>
20. WP. Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Rasch Meas Trans 2007; 21: 1095.
21. SSZ, Chean CS, Sandland-Taylor LE, Anuforom U, Patel D, Le GT, Khan AJ. Impact of COVID-19 on cataract surgery- patients’ perceptions while waiting for cataract surgery and their willingness to attend hospital for cataract surgery during the easing of lockdown period. Eye 2020; 22: 1–3.



