Acta Med. 2019, 62: 147-149

https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2020.3

Robotic Management of Endometriosis: Discussion of Use, Criteria and Advantages: a Review of the Literature

Ioannis D. Gkegkesa, Christos Iavazzob, George Iatrakisc, Paraskevi-Evangelia Iavazzod, Fani Pechlivanic, Evangelia Antoniouc, Konstadia Bakalianoue

aDepartment of Surgery, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
bDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK
cDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Technological Educational Institution of Athens, Athens, Greece
dDepartment of Paediatrics, General Hospital of Rethymno, Rethymno, Greece
eDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital “Agia Olga”, Athens, Greece

Received July 4, 2019
Accepted November 17, 2019

References

1. Neme RM, Schraibman V, Okazaki S, et al. Deep infiltrating colorectal endometriosis treated with robotic-assisted rectosigmoidectomy. JSLS 2013; 17(2): 227–34. <https://doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13693422521836> <PubMed>
2. Gui B, Valentini AL, Ninivaggi V, Marino M, Iacobucci M, Bonomo L. Deep pelvic endometriosis: don’t forget round ligaments. Review of anatomy, clinical characteristics, and MR imaging features. Abdom Imaging 2014; 39(3): 622–32. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0091-3>
3. Jacobson TZ. Potential cures for endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2011; 1221: 70–4. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05933.x>
4. Grandi G, Xholli A, Napolitano A, Palma F, Cagnacci A. Pelvic pain and quality of life of women with endometriosis during quadriphasic estradiol valerate/dienogest oral contraceptive: a patient-preference prospective 24-week pilot study. Reprod Sci 2015; 22(5): 626–32. <https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719114556488>
5. Agarwal S, Fraser MA, Chen I, Singh SS. Dienogest for the treatment of deep endometriosis: case report and literature review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015; 41(2): 309–13. <https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12527>
6. Yamaguti EM, Brito MB, Ferriani RA, Garcia AA, Rosa-e-Silva JC, Vieira CS. Comparison of the hemostatic effects of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and leuprolide acetate in women with endometriosis: a randomized clinical trial. Thromb Res 2014; 134(6): 1193–7. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2014.09.014>
7. Iavazzo C, Gkegkes ID. Single-site port robotic-assisted hysterectomy: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 289(4): 725–31. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-3129-9>
8. Iavazzo C, Papadopoulou EK, Gkegkes ID. Cost assessment of robotics in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014; 40(11): 2125–34. <https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12507>
9. Duffy JM, Arambage K, Correa FJ, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (4): CD011031.
10. Roman H. Endometriosis surgery and preservation of fertility, what surgeons should know. J Visc Surg 2018; 155 Suppl 1: S31–S36. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2018.03.002>
11. Nezhat C, Lewis M, Kotikela S, et al. Robotic versus standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2010; 94(7): 2758–60. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.031>
12. Siesto G, Ieda N, Rosati R, Vitobello D. Robotic surgery for deep endometriosis: a paradigm shift. Int J Med Robot 2014; 10(2): 140–6. <https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1518>
13. Frick AC, Barakat EE, Stein RJ, Mora M, Falcone T. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic management of ureteral endometriosis. JSLS 2011; 15(3): 396–9. <https://doi.org/10.4293/108680811X13125733356314> <PubMed>
14. Nezhat FR, Mahmoud MS. Allen masters peritoneal defect: a potential pathway to deep infiltrating rectovaginal endometriosis? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21(3): 321–2. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.10.001>
15. Iavazzo C, Gkegkes ID. Port site metastases after robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot 2013; 9(4): 423–7. <https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1512>
16. Gupta K, Mehta Y, Sarin Jolly A, Khanna S. Anaesthesia for robotic gynaecological surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2012; 40(4): 614–21. <https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X1204000406>
17. Patzkowsky KE, As-Sanie S, Smorgick N, Song AH, Advincula AP. Perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease. JSLS 2013; 17(1): 100–6. <https://doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13517013317914> <PubMed>
18. Bedaiwy MA, Rahman MY, Chapman M, et al. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the management of severe endometriosis: a retrospective review of short-term surgical outcomes. JSLS 2013; 17(1): 95–9. <https://doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13517013317275> <PubMed>
19. Giep BN, Giep HN, Hubert HB. Comparison of minimally invasive surgical approaches for hysterectomy at a community hospital: robotic- assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. J Robot Surg 2010 Sep; 4(3): 167–75. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-010-0206-y> <PubMed>
20. McAchran SE, Paolone DR. The iatrogenic ureterovaginal fistula. Urology 2013; 81(6): e35. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.02.008>
21. Smorgick N, DeLancey J, Patzkowsky K, Advincula A, Song A, As- Sanie S. Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120(3): 581–6. <https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182638c3a>
22. Deras P, Amraoui J, Boutin C, Laporte S, Ripart J. [Rhabdomyolysis and compartment syndrome of two forearms after robotic assisted prolonged surgery]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2010; 29(4): 301–3. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annfar.2010.01.018>
23. Carvalho L, Abrão MS, Deshpande A, Falcone T. Robotics as a new surgical minimally invasive approach to treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot 2012; 8(2): 160–5. <https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.451>
front cover

ISSN 1211-4286 (Print) ISSN 1805-9694 (Online)

Open access journal

Archive