Acta Med. 2018, 61: 41-46
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2018.49
Tunica Vaginalis Thickening, Hemorrhagic Infiltration and Inflammatory Changes in 8 Children with Primary Hydrocele; Reactive Mesothelial Hyperplasia? A Prospective Clinical Study
References
1. Indian J of Applied Research 2015; 5(10): 117–8.
J. Cause and management of hydrocele: a review article.
2. BJU Int 2002; 89(1): 37–43.
< C. The role of urologist in the treatment and elimination of lymphatic filariasis worldwide. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1465-5101.2001.vries.137.x>
3. Indep Rev 2014; 16(4–6): 145–50.
MS. Hydrocele.
4. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20: 1189–95.
< L, Giorgio A, de Stefano G, Farella N. Εcho color Doppler findings in post pubertal mumps epididymo orchitis. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2001.20.11.1189>
5. Urol 2005; 65: 1001.
< S, Perlmutter AE, Farivar-Mohseni H, Chang WW, Kandzari SJ. Rhabdomyosarcoma of tunica vaginalis masquerading as hydrocele. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.004>
6. Nat Rev Urol 2010; 7(7): 379–85.
< M, Castagnetti M, De Grazia E. Management of hydrocele in adolescent patients. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2010.80>
7. J Urol 2004; 171: 1765–72.
< A, Dogra VS, Seftel AD, Resnick MI. Benign intrascrotal lesions. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000123083.98845.88>
8. JBR-BTR 2014; 97: 259–61.
T, Ingabire MI, Jorion JL, Draguet AP. Fibrous pseudotumor of the tunica vaginalis: contrast enhanced sonography with pathologic correlation.
9. Radiographics 2009; 29: 2017–32.
< V, Serrano A, Marin A, et al. US of tunica vaginalis testis: Anatomic relationships and pathologic conditions. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.297095040>
10. Mostophi FK, Price EB. Tumors of the male genital system. In: Atlas of tumor pathology, 2nd series, Fascicle 8, Wasington DC: Armed Forces Institute Pathology, 1973: 151.
11. Urol 2006; 68: 427e17–e19.
PM, Pugliese JM, Allen RC. Benign fibrous pseudotumor of tunica vaginalis testis.
12. Int J Urol 2005; 12: 424–6.
< N, Yap RL, Gupta R, Fraser TG, Gonzalez CM. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the testis: a novel presentation of acute retroviral syndrome. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01065.x>
13. Urology 2006; 67(3): 623.e15–6.
WM, Hilsenbeck J, Waters WB. Fibromatous periorchitis of testis.
14. Holcomb GW, Murhy JP, Ostlie DJ. Ashcraft’s Pediatric Surgery. 6th edition. New York: Elsevier Saunders, 2014, Chapter 50, pp 679–88.
15. Ann Surg 1907; 46: 915–8.
< EW. The “Bottle Operation” method for the radical cure of hydrocele. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-190712000-00011>
<PubMed>
16. J Urol 2001; 165(1): 225–7.
< AB. Abdominoscrotal hydrocele in infancy: a review and presentation of the scrotal approach for correction. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-200101000-00065>
17. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49: 1656–8.
< G, Patoulias I, Kaselas C. Primary new-onset hydroceles presenting in late childhood and pre-adolescent patients resemble the adult type hydrocele pathology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.05.020>
18. J Urol 2008; 180: 1724–8.
< JM, Aaronson DS, Schrader R, Baskin LS. Hydrocele in the pediatric patient: inguinal or scrotal approach? https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.111>
19. J Urol 1957; 77: 282–4.
< S. The pathogenesis of idiopathic hydrocele and a simple operative technique. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)66554-6>
20. Am Surg 1951; 17: 681–6.
J, Allen L. A lymphatic defect in hydrocele.
21. BJU Int 2001; 87: 82–4.
< JH, Kim M, Lee NK, Park YH. The excisional, plication and internal drainage techniques: a comparison of the results for idiopathic hydrocele. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.00022.x>
22. Virchows Archiv 2001; 451(6): 987–97.
< F, Mikuz G, Boccon-Gibod L, et al. Psudoneoplastic lesions of the testis and paratesticular structures. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-007-0502-8>
<PubMed>
23. Semin Diagn Pathol 2000; 17: 294–306.
B, Srigley JR. Mesothelial lesions of the paratesticular region.
24. Tumori 2012; 98: 270–3.
< M, Mikuz G, Algaba F. Rare tumors of the testis and mesothelial proliferation in the tunica vaginalis. https://doi.org/10.1177/030089161209800216>
25. Korean J Pathol 2014; 48(3): 225–8.
< S, Acikalin A, Zeren H, et al. Well-Differentiated Papillary Mesothelioma of the Tunica Vaginalis: A Case Study and Review of the Literature. https://doi.org/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2014.48.3.225>
<PubMed>
26. Am J Surg Pathol 1986; 10: 34–47.
< JW, Hammar SP, McNutt MA. Reactive and neoplastic serosal tissue. A light-microscopic, ultrastructural, and immunocytochemical study. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-198601000-00005>
27. Urol 1989; 34: 102–4.
< G, Munn CS, Kiser LC, Wetzner SM, Tarabulcy E. Malignant mesothelioma of tunica vaginalis testis. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(89)90174-X>
28. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2009; 25: 77–81.
< JL, Hsu YH. Malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis testis: a case report and literature review. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70044-0>
29. Cases J 2008; 1: 310.
< A, Agrawal A, Gupta R, Hari S, Dey AB. Malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis of the testis without exposure to asbestos. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1626-1-310>
<PubMed>
30. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1996; 120(10): 959–66.
MT, Gentile P, Tarectecan A, Fuchs A. Malignant mesothelioma: immunohistochemistry and DNA ploidy analysis as methods to differentiate mesothelioma from benign reactive mesothelial cell proliferation and adenocarcinoma in pleural and peritoneal effusions.
31. J Pediatr Urol 2009; 5(3): 243–5.
< GR, De Oliveira VP, Reis PH, et al. A rare case of malignant hydrocele in a young patient. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.10.010>
32. Urol Oncol 2006; 24: 36–9.
< SR, Lotan T, Rapp DE, et al. Well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma occurring in the tunica vaginalis of the testis with contralateral atypical mesothelial hyperplasia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2005.06.021>