Acta Med. 2016, 59: 117-123
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2017.38
Common Mistakes in the Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in Turkey. A Retrospective Descriptive Multicenter Study
References
1. Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi 2015; 21: 23–9.
< D, Gula G. Assessment of Bone Mineral Density in Osteoporosis. https://doi.org/10.4274/tod.41275>
2. Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi 2014; 20: 104–9.
< G, Doğan SC, Hizmetli S, Hayta E. In urban areas of Sivas city the determination of bone mineral density reference values of healthy women who admitted to Cumhuriyet University Hospital Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic. https://doi.org/10.4274/tod.51422>
3. Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Special Topics 2009; 2(1): 50–61.
D. Osteoporozda görüntüleme yöntemlerinde gelişmeler.
4. J Clin Anal Med 2013; 4(3): 209–12.
< A, Uysal E, Karakoyun Ö. Bone Mineral Density Value in Kastamonu and Area of Turkish Society Women https://doi.org/10.4328/JCAM.1022>
5. Guglielmi G, Ferrari F, Bazzocchi A. Bone Mineral Density and Quantitative Imaging. In: W. C. G. Peh ed. Pitfalls in Diagnostic Radiology. Springer, 2015: 109–32.
6. Osteoporosis International 2014; 25(5): 1445–53.
< S, Munce S, Carlin L, Butt D, Tu K, Hawker G, et al. Fracture risk assessment after BMD examination: whose job is it, anyway? https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2661-1>
<PubMed>
7. Nature clinical practice Rheumatology 2008; 4(12): 667–74.
< EM, Lane NE. Common mistakes in the clinical use of bone mineral density testing. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncprheum0928>
<PubMed>
8. QJM: monthly journal of the Association of Physicians 2008; 101(8): 605–17.
< A, Roux C. DXA scanning in clinical practice. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcn022>
9. Current Radiology Reports 2014; 2(2): 1–6.
< G, Diano D, Ponti F, Bazzocchi A. Quality assurance in bone densitometry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-013-0033-9>
10. Journal of clinical densitometry: the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2007; 10(2): 189–95.
< AA, Colquhoun A, Hanley DA, Jankowski LG, Josse RG, Kendler DL, et al. Standards and guidelines for technologists performing central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2007.01.005>
11. European radiology 2015; 25(5): 1504–11.
< C, Bandirali M, Sconfienza LM, DʼAlonzo NK, Di Leo G, Papini GD, et al. Prevalence and type of errors in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3509-y>
12. Journal of clinical densitometry: the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2009; 12(1): 84–8.
< SM, Ichikawa LE, LaCroix AZ, Scholes D. Navel jewelry artifacts and intravertebral variation in spine bone densitometry in adolescents and young women. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2008.09.002>
<PubMed>
13. Journal of clinical densitometry: the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2006; 9(4): 388–92.
< EM, Binkley N, Petak SM. DXA quality matters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2006.07.002>
14. Journal of clinical densitometry: the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2006; 9(1): 97–104.
< DL, Kiebzak GM, Ambrose CG, Dinu C, Robertson S, Schmeer P, et al. Effect of calcium tablets on interpretation of lumbar spine DXA scans. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2005.12.002>
15. Journal of Clinical Densitometry 2005; 8(4): 472–5.
< JCH, Ong B. Evaluation of Femur Angle Abduction/Adduction and Bone Mineral Density Values. https://doi.org/10.1385/JCD:8:4:467>
16. MD-Medical data 2013; 5(3): 271–8.
J, Gojković F, Zvekić-Svorcan J, Ćulafić-Vojinović V, Elez J, Filipović K. The most common mistakes in bone mineral density testing with DXA method.
17. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Special Topics 2010; 3(2): 29–38.
M, Ozaksoy D, Dogan S. Osteoporozda Radyolojik Görüntüleme.
18. Turk J Nucl Med 2009; 18(1): 31–40.
T, Ozen A, Yuksel D, Altun D, Ozturk E, Balci TA, et al. Kemik mineral yoğunluğu ölçümü uygulama kılavuzu.
19. Journal of clinical densitometry: the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2013; 16(2): 154–9.
< D, Vallarta-Ast N, Libber J, Checovich M, Gangnon R, Binkley N. Positioner and clothing artifact can affect one-third radius bone mineral density measurement. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2012.02.007>
<PubMed>
20. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 2003; 20(4): 353–60.
< B. DXAscanning to diagnose osteoporosis: Do you know what the results mean? https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.70.4.353>
21. Journal of clinical densitometry: the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2003; 6(4): 331–6.
< S, Lenora RS. Effect of leg rotation on hip bone mineral density measurements. https://doi.org/10.1385/JCD:6:4:331>
22. Orthopaedic review 1994; 23(1): 38–40.
MS, Sartoris DJ, Moscona AA, Ramos E. Measured femoral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry as a function of rotation.
23. Bone 1997; 21(1): 113–7.
< XG, Nicholson PH, Boonen S, Brys P, Lowet G, Nijs J, et al. Effects of anteversion on femoral bone mineral density and geometry measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a cadaver study. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(97)00083-5>