Acta Med. 2016, 59: 14-17
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2016.49
A Study Comparing the Efficacy of Monopolar Radiofrequency and Glycolic Acid Peels in Facial Rejuvenation of Aging Skin Using Histopathology and Ultrabiomicroscopic Sonography (UBM) – An Evidence Based Study
References
1. BA. Skin Aging 2003: Recent advances and current concepts. Cutis 2003; 72(Suppl 3): 5–10.
2. M, el-Ammawi TS, Medhat W, et al. Radiofrequency facial rejuvenation: Evidence-based effect. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011 Mar; 64(3): 524–35.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2010.06.045>
<PubMed>
3. W, Kirchner S, Carlisle K. Histology of sun-damaged human skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 21: 907–18.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(89)70276-0>
4. R, Gartstein V, Kligman AM et al. Age, sunlight, and facial skin: A histologic and quantitative study. J Am Acad Dermatol 25: 751–60.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(08)80964-4>
5. M, Jemec GBE. Quantitative evaluation of chronological ageing and photoageing in vivo: studies on skin echogenicity and thickness. Br J Dermatol 1998; 139: 815–21.
<https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02506.x>
6. J, Escoffier C, Querleux B, et al. Assessment of Aging of the Human Skin by In Vivo Ultrasonic Imaging. J Invest Dermatol 1989 Nov; 93(5): 621–5.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12319741>
7. DJ, Rogachefsky AS, Silapunt S. Non-ablative laser treatment of facial rhytides: a comparison of 1450 diode laser treatment with dynamic cooling device as opposed to treatment with dynamic cooling alone. Lasers Surg Med 2002; 30: 79–81.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.10011>
8. M, Ueda S, Imayama S, et al. New formulation of chemical peeling agent: histological evaluation in sun-damaged skin model in hairless mice. J Dermatol Sci. 2001 Aug; 27(Suppl 1): S60–7.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-1811(01)00111-6>
