Acta Med. 2015, 58: 43-48
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2015.92
Factors Affecting the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets – a Review of In Vitro Studies
References
1. J Dent Res 2001 Jul; 80(7): 1605–14.
< G, D’Hoore W, Bouter D, Degrange M, Vreven J. Meta-analytical review of factors involved in dentin adherence. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800070301>
2. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010 May; 137(5): 615–22 e3.
< KJ, Ozcan M, Post WJ, Ren Y, Dijkstra PU. In-vitro orthodontic bond strength testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.021>
3. J Dent Res 1955 Dec; 34(6): 849–53.
< MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801>
4. Am J Orthod 1965 Dec; 51(12): 901–12.
< GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(65)90203-4>
5. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999 Jan; 115(1): 24–8.
< SE, Gordan VV, VonWald L, Jakobsen JR. Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70312-4>
6. Am J Dent 1999 Dec; 12(6): 277–82.
UB, Finger WJ. Bonding efficiency of single-bottle enamel/dentin adhesives.
7. Am J Dent 1997 Jun; 10(3): 141–6.
J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P, Leitao J, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Effects of a self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology.
8. J Dent Res 1999 Apr; 78(4): 906–11.
< H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira PN, et al. Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer, in vivo. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780041101>
9. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993 Jan; 103(1): 71–3.
< LR, Barnes CM, Leinfelder KF. Applications of the air-powder polisher in clinical orthodontics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(93)70109-2>
10. J Am Dent Assoc 1994 May; 125(5): 551–7.
< RE, Parkins FM. Air-abrasive technology: its new role in restorative dentistry. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1994.0077>
11. Lasers Med Sci 2014 May; 29(3): 897–905.
< MC, Portillo M, Moreno P, et al. In vitro analysis of femtosecond laser as an alternative to acid etching for achieving suitable bond strength of brackets to human enamel. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1278-5>
12. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997 May; 111(5): 498–501.
< ME, Bishara SE, Damon P, Jakobsen JR. Evaluation of Scotchbond Multipurpose and maleic acid as alternative methods of bonding orthodontic brackets. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70286-5>
13. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995 Sep; 108(3): 274–7.
< W. Effect of reduction of phosphoric acid concentration on the shear bond strength of brackets. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70021-8>
14. British journal of orthodontics 1996; 23(2): 121–4.
Abdullah M, Rock WP. The effect of etch time and debond interval upon the shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets.
15. Dent Mater 2001 Mar; 17(2): 184–9.
< RS, McCabe JF, Hogg SD. Bond strength to surface enamel for different tooth types. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00068-3>
16. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009 Sep; 136(3): 425–30.
< Vilchis RJ, Yamamoto S, Kitai N, Yamamoto K. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.024>
17. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009 Apr; 135(4): 424 e1–7; discussion 5.
RJ, Ohashi S, Yamamoto K. Effects of 6 self-etching primers on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
18. Am J Dent 2005 Aug; 18(4): 256–60.
A, Bravo LA, Romero M, Ortiz AJ, Canteras M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching primers.
19. Angle Orthod 2002 Jun; 72(3): 199–202.
SE, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of a fluoride-releasing self-etch acidic primer on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
20. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005 May; 127(5): 573–9; quiz 625–6.
< ZC, Kecik D, Kocadereli I. Effect of self-etching primer and adhesive formulations on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.027>
21. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997 Nov; 112(5): 502–6.
< ME, Bishara SE, Damon P, Jakobsen JR. Comparison of shear bond strength and surface structure between conventional acid etching and air-abrasion of human enamel. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70077-5>
22. Eur J Orthod 2004 Apr; 26(2): 179–84.
< ES, Al-Wahadni AM. Evaluation of shear bond strength with different enamel pre-treatments. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/26.2.179>
23. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000 Jan; 117(1): 15–9.
< S, Kocadereli I, Akça E. The effect of enamel air abrasion on the retention of bonded metallic orthodontic brackets. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70243-5>
24. Angle Orthod 2003 Oct; 73(5): 565–70.
BS, Hsieh TT, Lee YL, Lan WH, Hsu YJ, Wen PH, et al. Bond strengths of orthodontic bracket after acid-etched, Er:YAG laser-irradiated and combined treatment on enamel surface.
25. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2014 May; 11(3): 321–6.
S, Birang R, Hajizadeh F. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets after acid-etched and erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser-etched.
26. Angle Orthod 2013 Nov; 83(6): 973–80.
< S, Usumez A, Ademci E, Usumez S. Effect of enamel laser irradiation at different pulse settings on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. https://doi.org/10.2319/111412-872.1>
<PubMed>
27. Photomed Laser Surg 2007 Dec; 25(6): 508–12.
< A, Ozel Y, Ozel E, et al. The influence of Er:YAG laser conditioning versus self-etching adhesives with acid etching on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2007.2096>
28. Photomed Laser Surg 2013 Aug; 31(8): 360–4.
< M, Pakshir HR, Najafi HZ, Naseri MM, Nasrabadi NI, Torkan S. Comparison of the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets in bonding and rebonding: preparation with laser versus conventional acid etch technique. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2013.3477>
29. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990 Feb; 97(2): 121–5.
< VP, Rossouw E. The shear bond strengths of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(90)70084-P>
30. Br J Orthod 1992 Aug; 19(3): 183–9.
< CM, Hagberg C. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with chemical or mechanical retention. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.19.3.183>
31. J Clin Orthod 1993 Feb; 27(2): 83–8.
S, Garcia-Godoy F. Shear bond strengths and effects on enamel of two ceramic brackets.
32. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990 Sep; 98(3): 214–21.
< AD, Cavanaugh G, Bevis RR. Bond strength of ceramic brackets under shear stress: an in vitro report. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81598-7>
33. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005 Dec; 128(6): 761–5; quiz 802.
< JK, Chung CH, Chang CY, Shieh DB. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.041>
34. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999 Dec; 116(6): 635–41.
< KS, Sadowsky PL, Lacefield W, Bae S. An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70198-8>
35. Br J Orthodont 1975; 2: 171–8.
< I. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. https://doi.org/10.1080/0301228X.1975.11743666>
36. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000 Apr; 117(4): 438–43.
< G, Takano-Yamamoto T, Miyamoto M, Hattori T, Ishikawa K, Suzuki K. Shear bond strengths of orthodontic plastic brackets. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70163-6>
37. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002 Sep; 122(3): 260–6.
< O, El Alam R, Chagneau F, Cathelineau G. Comparison of bond strength between simple foil mesh and laser-structured base retention brackets. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.125834>
38. Angle Orthod 2006 Sep; 76(5): 851–6.
P, Martucci L, De Toffol L, Penco SI. Shear bond strength of metal brackets on enamel.
39. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004 Jan; 125(1): 65–70.
< WN, Li CH, Chou TH, Wang DD, Lin LH, Lin CT. Bond strength of various bracket base designs. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.01.003>
40. Eur J Orthod 2005 Oct; 27(5): 477–83.
< HZ, Ogaard B, Syverud M. An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement and a composite adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji051>
41. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999 Nov; 116(5): 506–13.
< RL, Watson PA, Rossouw PE, Sectakof PA. Adhesion of bonded orthodontic attachments to dental amalgam: In vitro study. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70180-0>
42. Eur J Orthod 2007 Aug; 29(4): 386–9.
< ES, Al-Wahadni AM. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm032>
43. Angle Orthod 2009 Jul; 79(4): 784–9.
< S, Heshmati R, Dhuru V, Iacopino A. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to provisional crown materials utilizing two different adhesives. https://doi.org/10.2319/060908-298.1>
44. Angle Orthod 2014 Jul; 84(4): 649–55.
< YS, Al Taweel SM, Al Rifaiy M, Alqahtani MQ, Koutsoukis T, Zinelis S. Effects of surface treatment and artificial aging on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to four different provisional restorations. https://doi.org/10.2319/090313-649.1>
<PubMed>
45. Journal of dental research 1990; 69 Spec No: 692–700; discussion 21.
< O, Manji F, Baelum V. The nature and mechanisms of dental fluorosis in man. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690S135>
46. J Oral Rehabil 1999 Jun; 26(6): 521–8.
< MH, Akpata ES. Effect of fluorosis on etching of human enamel. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00391.x>
47. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992 Sep; 102(3): 244–50.
< PM, Ogaard B, Cruz R, Chindia ML, Aasrum E. Tensile strength of orthodontic brackets bonded directly to fluorotic and nonfluorotic teeth: an in vitro comparative study. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81059-5>
48. Eur J Orthod 2009 Jun; 31(3): 276–80.
< N, Turkkahraman H, Yalcin Gungor A. Effects of adhesion promoters on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjn093>
49. Eur J Dent 2009 Jul; 3(3): 173–7.
AY, Turkkahraman H, Adanir N, Alkis H. Effects of fluorosis and self etching primers on shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets.
50. Eur J Orthod 2011 Apr; 33(2): 161–6.
< D, Sahin Saglam AM, Alkis H, Elekdag-Turk S, Turk T. Effects of fluorosis on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a self-etching primer. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq063>
51. Indian J Dent Res 2012 Mar–Apr; 23(2): 230–5.
< S, Anita G, Chandra Shekar BR, Kallury A. The effect of air abrasion on the retention of metallic brackets bonded to fluorosed enamel surface. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.100432>
52. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998 Aug; 114(2): 150–3.
< SE, Vonwald L, Zamtua J, Damon PL. Effects of various methods of chlorhexidine application on shear bond strength. https://doi.org/10.1053/od.1998.v114.a84780>
53. Angle Orthod 2008 Jan; 78(1): 129–33.
< D, Cehreli SB, Sar C, Unver B. Effect of acidulated phosphate fluoride and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate application on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. https://doi.org/10.2319/122506-529.1>
54. BMC Oral Health 2014; 14: 28.
< HM, Al-Jobair AM. Effect of different preventive agents on bracket shear bond strength: in vitro study. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-28>
<PubMed>