Acta Med. 2015, 58: 15-20

A Comparison of Three Rubber Dam Systems In Vivo – A Preliminary Study

Martin Kapitán, Tereza Suchánková Kleplová, Jakub Suchánek

Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Department of Dentistry, Czech Republic

Received August 5, 2014
Accepted March 28, 2015


1. Glickman GN, Vogt MW. Preparation for treatment. In: Hargreaves KM, Cohen SC, eds. Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp. 10th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2011: 88–123.
2. Lin PY, Huang SH, Chang HJ, Chi LY. The effect of rubber dam usage on the survival rate of teeth receiving initial root canal treatment: a nationwide population-based study. J Endod 2014; 40(11): 1733–7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Aug 28. <>
3. Baumann MA, Beer R. Endodontology. 2nd ed. NewYork: Thieme, 2010: 424.
4. Winkler R. Kofferdam in Theorie und Praxis. Berlin: Quintessenz-Verl.-GmbH, 1991: 204.
5. Ahmed HM, Cohen S, Lévy G, Steier L, Bukiet F. Rubber dam application in endodontic practice: an update on critical educational and ethical dilemmas. Aust Dent J 2014; 59(4): 457–63. doi: 10.1111/adj.12210. Epub 2014 Sep 30. <>
6. Kapitán M. The usage of the rubber dam in restorative dentistry and endodontics (Doctoral thesis). Hradec Králové, Czech Republic: Charles University, 2014.
7. Kapitán M, Šustová Z. The Use of Rubber Dam among Czech Dental Practitioners. Acta Medica (Hradec Králové) 2011; 54(4): 144–8. <>
8. Ahmad IA. Rubber dam usage for endodontic treatment: A review. Int Endod J 2009; 42(11): 963–72. <>
9. Anabtawi MF, Gilbert GH, Bauer MR, Reams G, Makhija SK, Benjamin PL, Dale Williams O; National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group. Rubber dam use during root canal treatment: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Am Dent Assoc 2013; 144(2): 179–86. <> <PubMed>
10. European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 921–30. <>
11. American Association of Endodontists. AAE position statement: dental dams (released 2010). (Accessed December 12, 2013, at: /publications_and_research/guidelines_and_position_statements/dentaldamstate ment.pdf).
12. Hill EE, Rubel BS. Do dental educators need to improve their approach to teaching rubber dam use? J Dent Educ 2008; 72(10): 1177–81. <>
13. Lynch CD, McConnell RJ. Attitudes and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 427–32. <>
14. Marshall K. Rubber dam. Br Dent J 1998; 184(5): 218–9. <>
15. Ryan W, O’Connel A. The attitudes of undergraduate dental students to the use of the rubber dam. J Ir Dent Assoc 2007; 53(2): 87–91.
16. Whitworth JM, Seccombe GV, Shoker K, Steele JG. Use of rubber dam and irrigant selection in UK general dental practice. Int Endod J 2000; 33: 435–41. <>
17. Filipović J, Jukić S, Miletić I, Pavelić B, Malčić A, Anić I. Patient’s attitude to rubber dam use. Acta Stomatol Croat 2004; 38(4): 319–22.
18. Kapitán M, Hodačová L, Jagelská J, Kaplan J, Ivančáková R, Šustová Z. The attitude of Czech dental patients to the use of rubber dam. Health expectations 2013 Jun 24 [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1111/hex.12102. <> <PubMed>
19. Reuter JE. The isolation of teeth and the protection of the patient during endodontic treatment. Int Endod J 1983; 16: 173–81. <>
20. Slaus G, Minoodt I, Bottenberg P. The rubber dam, a problem for the dentist or the patient? Rev Belge Med Dent 2005; 60(4): 301–9. [French]
21. Stewardson DA, McHugh ES. Patients’ attitudes to rubber dam. Int Endod J 2002; 35(10): 812–9. <>
22. Kapitán M, Šustová Z, Ivančaková R, Suchánek J. A comparison of different rubber dam systems on a dental simulator. Acta Medica (Hradec Králové) 2014; 57(1): 15–20. <>
23. Feierabend SA, Matt J, Klaiber B. A comparison of conventional and new rubber dam systems in dental practice. Oper Dent 2011; 36(3): 243–50. <>
front cover

ISSN 1211-4286 (Print) ISSN 1805-9694 (Online)

Open access journal