Acta Med. 2015, 58: 15-20
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2015.86
A Comparison of Three Rubber Dam Systems In Vivo – A Preliminary Study
References
1. Glickman GN, Vogt MW. Preparation for treatment. In: Hargreaves KM, Cohen SC, eds. Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp. 10th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2011: 88–123.
2. PY, Huang SH, Chang HJ, Chi LY. The effect of rubber dam usage on the survival rate of teeth receiving initial root canal treatment: a nationwide population-based study. J Endod 2014; 40(11): 1733–7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.07.007>
3. Baumann MA, Beer R. Endodontology. 2nd ed. NewYork: Thieme, 2010: 424.
4. Winkler R. Kofferdam in Theorie und Praxis. Berlin: Quintessenz-Verl.-GmbH, 1991: 204.
5. HM, Cohen S, Lévy G, Steier L, Bukiet F. Rubber dam application in endodontic practice: an update on critical educational and ethical dilemmas. Aust Dent J 2014; 59(4): 457–63. doi: 10.1111/adj.12210. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12210>
6. Kapitán M. The usage of the rubber dam in restorative dentistry and endodontics (Doctoral thesis). Hradec Králové, Czech Republic: Charles University, 2014.
7. M, Šustová Z. The Use of Rubber Dam among Czech Dental Practitioners. Acta Medica (Hradec Králové) 2011; 54(4): 144–8.
<https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2016.38>
8. IA. Rubber dam usage for endodontic treatment: A review. Int Endod J 2009; 42(11): 963–72.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01623.x>
9. MF, Gilbert GH, Bauer MR, Reams G, Makhija SK, Benjamin PL, Dale Williams O; National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group. Rubber dam use during root canal treatment: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Am Dent Assoc 2013; 144(2): 179–86.
<https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0097>
<PubMed>
10. European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 921–30.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01180.x>
11. American Association of Endodontists. AAE position statement: dental dams (released 2010). (Accessed December 12, 2013, at: http://www.aae.org/uploadedfiles /publications_and_research/guidelines_and_position_statements/dentaldamstate ment.pdf).
12. EE, Rubel BS. Do dental educators need to improve their approach to teaching rubber dam use? J Dent Educ 2008; 72(10): 1177–81.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2008.72.10.tb04596.x>
13. CD, McConnell RJ. Attitudes and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 427–32.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01212.x>
14. K. Rubber dam. Br Dent J 1998; 184(5): 218–9.
<https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809584>
15. W, O’Connel A. The attitudes of undergraduate dental students to the use of the rubber dam. J Ir Dent Assoc 2007; 53(2): 87–91.
16. JM, Seccombe GV, Shoker K, Steele JG. Use of rubber dam and irrigant selection in UK general dental practice. Int Endod J 2000; 33: 435–41.
<https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00329.x>
17. J, Jukić S, Miletić I, Pavelić B, Malčić A, Anić I. Patient’s attitude to rubber dam use. Acta Stomatol Croat 2004; 38(4): 319–22.
18. Kapitán M, Hodačová L, Jagelská J, Kaplan J, Ivančáková R, Šustová Z. The attitude of Czech dental patients to the use of rubber dam. Health expectations 2013 Jun 24 [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1111/hex.12102.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12102>
<PubMed>
19. JE. The isolation of teeth and the protection of the patient during endodontic treatment. Int Endod J 1983; 16: 173–81.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1983.tb01321.x>
20. G, Minoodt I, Bottenberg P. The rubber dam, a problem for the dentist or the patient? Rev Belge Med Dent 2005; 60(4): 301–9. [French]
21. DA, McHugh ES. Patients’ attitudes to rubber dam. Int Endod J 2002; 35(10): 812–9.
<https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00571.x>
22. M, Šustová Z, Ivančaková R, Suchánek J. A comparison of different rubber dam systems on a dental simulator. Acta Medica (Hradec Králové) 2014; 57(1): 15–20.
<https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2014.3>
23. SA, Matt J, Klaiber B. A comparison of conventional and new rubber dam systems in dental practice. Oper Dent 2011; 36(3): 243–50.
<https://doi.org/10.2341/09-283-C>
