Acta Med. 2014, 57: 62-67
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2014.41
THE CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT, THE MALE TO FEMALE RATIO AT BIRTH AND BIRTH RATES
References
1. H, Weigelt E. Congenital Malformation and Stillbirth in Germany and Europe Before and after the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident. Environ Sci & Pollut Res. 2003; 1: 117–125.
2. GI, Nikolaev DL, Novikova IV. Changes in registered congenital anomalies in the Republic of Belarus after the Chernobyl accident. Stem Cells 1997; 15(Suppl 2): 255–60.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.5530150734>
3. A, Spix C, Mergenthaler A, Queisser-Luft A. Maternal occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and birth defects. Radiat Environ Biophys 2011; 50: 325–8.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-010-0350-9>
4. WH. The human sex ratio. Part 1: A review of the literature. Hum Biol 1987; 59: 721–752.
5. JV, Schull WJ, et al. Implications of the Hiroshima-Nagasaki genetic studies for the estimation of the human “doubling dose” of radiation. Genome 1989; 31: 853–9.
<https://doi.org/10.1139/g89-150>
6. WH. Ionizing radiation and offspring sex ratio. J Epidemiol Community Health 1997; 51: 340–1.
<https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.51.3.340>
<PubMed>
7. HO, Parker L, Binks K, Wakeford R, Smith J. The sex ratio of children in relation to paternal preconceptional radiation dose: a study in Cumbria, northern England. J Epidemiol Community Health 1996; 50: 645–52.
<https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.50.6.645>
<PubMed>
8. WJ, Neel JV. Radiation and the sex ratio in man. Science 1958; 128: 343–8.
<https://doi.org/10.1126/science.128.3320.343>
9. H, Voigt K. Trends in the human sex odds at birth in Europe and the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident. Reprod Toxicol 2007; 23: 593–9.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.03.008>
10. E. Thyroid cancer incidence among people living in areas contaminated by radiation from the Chernobyl accident. Health Phys 2007; 93: 502–11.
<https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HP.0000279018.93081.29>
11. Chernobyl Forum Expert Group. Environmental Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident and their Remediation: Twenty Years of Experience. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency 2006.
12. H, Voigt K. The human sex odds at birth after the atmospheric atomic bomb tests, after Chernobyl, and in the vicinity of nuclear facilities. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2011; 18: 697–707.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0462-z>
13. K, Pelz J, Wegner RD, Dorries A, Gruters A, Mikkelsen M. Significant increase in trisomy 21 in Berlin nine months after the Chernobyl reactor accident: temporal correlation or causal relation? BMJ 1994; 309: 158–62.
<https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6948.158>
<PubMed>
14. IO, Verger P, Robert-Gnansia E, Gagniere B, Khmel RD, Lazjuk GI. Cluster of Down’s syndrome cases registered in January 1987 in Republic of Belarus as a possible effect of the Chernobyl accident. Int J Radiat Med 2004; 6: 57–71.
15. Fernandez SJ, Medina RS, Britton J, Fogarty AW. The association between living through a prolonged economic depression and the male:female birth ratio – a longitudinal study from Cuba, 1960–2008. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 174: 1327–1331.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwr357>
16. H, Kusmierz R, Voigt K. Increased sex ratio in Russia and Cuba after Chernobyl: a radiological hypothesis. Environ Health 2013 Aug 15; 12: 63. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-63.
<https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-12-63>
<PubMed>
17. V. Secular trends and latitude gradients in sex ratios at birth in the former Soviet republics. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 2013; 56: 162–166.
<https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2014.12>
18. WA1, Chamlin MB, Cochran JK. An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis of Durkheim’s Social Deregulation Thesis: The Case of the Russian Federation. Justice Q 2007; 24: 271.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820701294813>
<PubMed>
19. EJ. Mental health consequences of the Chernobyl disaster. J Radiol Prot 2012; 32: 71–5.
<https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/32/1/N71>
20. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons 1981: 14–15.
21. WG. Some methods for strengthening the common chi-squared tests. Biometrics 1954; 10: 417–451.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/3001616>
22. P. Tests for Linear Trends in Proportions and Frequencies. Biometrics 1955; 11: 375–386.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/3001775>
23. C. Sulla probabilita che termini di una serie erratica sieno tutti crescenti (o non decrescenti) ovvero tutti decrescenti (o non crescenti) con applicazioni ai rapporti dei sessi nascite umane in intervalli successivi e alle disposizioni dei sessi nelle fratellanze umane. Metron 1955; 17: 1–41.
24. Vogel F, Motulsky AG. Human genetics. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer 1986.
25. International Atomic Energy Agency. The International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency 2010.
26. Chernobyl Forum: 2003–2005. Chernobyl’s Legacy: Health, Environmental and Socio-economic Impacts and Recommendations to the Governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency 2006.
27. FN. The radiological and psychological consequences of the Fukushima Daiichi accident. Bull Atomic Scientists 2011; 67: 27–36.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340211421588>
