Acta Med. 2014, 57: 15-20
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2014.3
A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT RUBBER DAM SYSTEMS ON A DENTAL SIMULATOR
References
1. IA. Rubber dam usage for endodontic treatment: A review. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 963–72.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01623.x>
2. Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 921–30.
3. EE, Rubel BS. Do dental educators need to improve their approach to teaching rubber dam use? J Dent Educ 2008; 72: 1177–81.
4. M, Sustova Z. The use of rubber dam among Czech dental practitioners. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 2011; 54: 144–8.
<https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2016.38>
5. CD, McConnell RJ. Attitudes and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 427–32.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01212.x>
6. D, Wilson S. Rubber Dam Use: A survey of pediatric dentistry training programs and private practitioners. Pediatr Dent 2010; 32: 64–8.
7. JM, Seccombe GV, Shoker K, Steele JG. Use of rubber dam and irrigant selection in UK general dental practice. Int Endod J 2000; 33: 435–41.
<https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00329.x>
8. S, Chandler NP. Use of rubber dam and its association with other endodontic procedures in New Zealand. N Z Dent J 2002; 98: 12–6.
9. H, Mahseredjian S. Time taken to position a rubber dam by fourth year dental students at the University of Montreal. J Can Dent Assoc 1992; 58: 228–9.
10. J, Jukić S, Miletić I, Pavelić B, Malčić A, Anić I. Patient’s attitude to rubber dam use. Acta Stomatol Croat 2004; 38: 319–22.
11. DA, McHugh ES. Patients’ attitudes to rubber dam. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 812–9
<https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00571.x>
12. SA, Matt J, Klaiber B. A comparison of conventional and new rubber dam systems in dental practice. Oper Dent 2011; 36: 243–50.
<https://doi.org/10.2341/09-283-C>
