Acta Med. 2014, 57: 9-14


Efstathios T. Detorakisa, Eleni E. Drakonakib, Harilaos Ginisa, Nikolaos Karyotakisa, Ioannis G. Pallikarisa,c

a Institute of Vision & Optics, University of Crete
bDepartment of Medical Imaging, University Hospital of Heraklion, Greece
cUniversity Hospital of Heraklion, Greece, Department of Ophthalmology


1. Konofagou EE, Harrigan TP, Ophir J, Krouskop TA. Poroelastography: Imaging the poroelastic propertied of tissues. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. 2001; 27: 1387–97. <>
2. Riek K, Klatt D, Nuzha H, et al. Wide-range dynamic magnetic resonance elastography. J Biomech. 2011; 44: 1380–6. <>
3. Garra BS. Elastography: current status, future prospects, and making it work for you. Ultrasound Q. 2011; 27: 177–86. <>
4. Wells PN, Liang HD. Medical ultrasound: imaging of soft tissue strain and elasticity. J R Soc Interface. 2011; 8: 1521–49. Review. <> <PubMed>
5. Detorakis ET, Drakonaki EE, Tsilimbaris MK, Pallikaris IG, Giarmenitis S. Real-Time Ultrasound Elastographic Imaging of Ocular and Periocular Tissues: A Feasibility Study. Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers, Imaging. 2010; 41: 135–41. <>
6. Hoyt K, Hah Z, Hazard C, Parker KJ. Experimental validation of acoustic radiation force induced shear wave interference patterns. Phys Med Biol. 2012; 57: 21–30. <> <PubMed>
7. Tanter M, Touboul D, Gennisson JL, Bercoff J, Fink M. High-resolution quantitative imaging of cornea elasticity using supersonic shear imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009; 28: 1881–93. <>
8. Holve DL, Gum GG, Pritt SL. Effect of sedation with xylazine and ketamine on intraocular pressure in New Zealand white rabbits. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2013; 52: 488–90.
9. Namani R, Bayly PV. Shear wave propagation in anisotropic soft tissues and gels. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009; 2009: 1117–22.
10. Kapoor A, Kapoor A, Mahajan G, Sidhu BS, Lakhanpal VP. Real-time elastography in differentiating metastatic from nonmetastatic liver nodules. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011; 37: 207–13. <>
11. Zhai L, Madden J, Foo WC, et al. Characterizing stiffness of human prostates using acoustic radiation force. Ultrason Imaging. 2010; 32: 201–13. <> <PubMed>
12. Pardue MT, Sivak JG. Age-related changes in human ciliary muscle. Optom Vis Sci. 2000; 77: 204–10. <>
13. Celebi S, Aykan U.The comparison of cyclopentolate and atropine in patients with refractive accommodative esotropia by means of retinoscopy, autorefractometry and biometric lens thickness. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999; 77: 426–9. <>
14. Chen YY, Chen YY, Sheu SJ, Chou P. The biometric study in different stages of primary angle-closure glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 2013; 27: 1070–6. <> <PubMed>
15. Marchini G, Pagliarusco A, Toscano A, et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopic and conventional ultrasonographic study of ocular dimensions in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105: 2091–8. <>
16. Bill A, Stjernschantz J. Cholinergic vasoconstrictor effects in the rabbit eye: vasomotor effects of pentobarbital anesthesia. Acta Physiol Scand. 1980; 108: 419–24. <>
17. Agrawal KK, Sharma DP, Bhargava G, Sanadhya DK. Scleral rigidity in glaucoma, before and during topical antiglaucoma drug therapy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1991; 39: 85–6.
18. Tozaki M, Fukuma E. Pattern classification of ShearWave™ Elastography images for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant solid breast masses. Acta Radiol. 2011; 52: 1069–75. <>
19. Friedenwald JS. Tonometer calibration; an attempt to remove discrepancies found in the 1954 calibration scale for Schiotz tonometers. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1957; 61: 108–222.
20. Werner L, Chew J, Mamalis N. Experimental evaluation of ophthalmic devices and solutions using rabbit models. Vet Ophthalmol. 2006; 9: 281–91. <>
21. Palte HD, Gayer S, Arrieta E, et al. Are ultrasound-guided ophthalmic blocks injurious to the eye? A comparative rabbit model study of two ultrasound devices evaluating intraorbital thermal and structural changes. Anesth Analg. 2012; 115: 194–201. <> <PubMed>
front cover

ISSN 1211-4286 (Print) ISSN 1805-9694 (Online)

Open access journal