Acta Med. 2014, 57: 9-14

https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2014.2

EVALUATION OF IRIDOCILIARY AND LENTICULAR ELASTICITY USING SHEAR-WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY IN RABBIT EYES

Efstathios T. Detorakisa, Eleni E. Drakonakib, Harilaos Ginisa, Nikolaos Karyotakisa, Ioannis G. Pallikarisa,c

a Institute of Vision & Optics, University of Crete
bDepartment of Medical Imaging, University Hospital of Heraklion, Greece
cUniversity Hospital of Heraklion, Greece, Department of Ophthalmology

References

1. Konofagou EE, Harrigan TP, Ophir J, Krouskop TA. Poroelastography: Imaging the poroelastic propertied of tissues. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. 2001; 27: 1387–97. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-5629(01)00433-1>
2. Riek K, Klatt D, Nuzha H, et al. Wide-range dynamic magnetic resonance elastography. J Biomech. 2011; 44: 1380–6. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.12.031>
3. Garra BS. Elastography: current status, future prospects, and making it work for you. Ultrasound Q. 2011; 27: 177–86. <https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0b013e31822a2138>
4. Wells PN, Liang HD. Medical ultrasound: imaging of soft tissue strain and elasticity. J R Soc Interface. 2011; 8: 1521–49. Review. <https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0054> <PubMed>
5. Detorakis ET, Drakonaki EE, Tsilimbaris MK, Pallikaris IG, Giarmenitis S. Real-Time Ultrasound Elastographic Imaging of Ocular and Periocular Tissues: A Feasibility Study. Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers, Imaging. 2010; 41: 135–41. <https://doi.org/10.3928/15428877-20091230-24>
6. Hoyt K, Hah Z, Hazard C, Parker KJ. Experimental validation of acoustic radiation force induced shear wave interference patterns. Phys Med Biol. 2012; 57: 21–30. <https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/57/1/21> <PubMed>
7. Tanter M, Touboul D, Gennisson JL, Bercoff J, Fink M. High-resolution quantitative imaging of cornea elasticity using supersonic shear imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009; 28: 1881–93. <https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2009.2021471>
8. Holve DL, Gum GG, Pritt SL. Effect of sedation with xylazine and ketamine on intraocular pressure in New Zealand white rabbits. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2013; 52: 488–90.
9. Namani R, Bayly PV. Shear wave propagation in anisotropic soft tissues and gels. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009; 2009: 1117–22.
10. Kapoor A, Kapoor A, Mahajan G, Sidhu BS, Lakhanpal VP. Real-time elastography in differentiating metastatic from nonmetastatic liver nodules. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011; 37: 207–13. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.11.013>
11. Zhai L, Madden J, Foo WC, et al. Characterizing stiffness of human prostates using acoustic radiation force. Ultrason Imaging. 2010; 32: 201–13. <https://doi.org/10.1177/016173461003200401> <PubMed>
12. Pardue MT, Sivak JG. Age-related changes in human ciliary muscle. Optom Vis Sci. 2000; 77: 204–10. <https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200004000-00013>
13. Celebi S, Aykan U.The comparison of cyclopentolate and atropine in patients with refractive accommodative esotropia by means of retinoscopy, autorefractometry and biometric lens thickness. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999; 77: 426–9. <https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0420.1999.770414.x>
14. Chen YY, Chen YY, Sheu SJ, Chou P. The biometric study in different stages of primary angle-closure glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 2013; 27: 1070–6. <https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2013.127> <PubMed>
15. Marchini G, Pagliarusco A, Toscano A, et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopic and conventional ultrasonographic study of ocular dimensions in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105: 2091–8. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91132-0>
16. Bill A, Stjernschantz J. Cholinergic vasoconstrictor effects in the rabbit eye: vasomotor effects of pentobarbital anesthesia. Acta Physiol Scand. 1980; 108: 419–24. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1980.tb06553.x>
17. Agrawal KK, Sharma DP, Bhargava G, Sanadhya DK. Scleral rigidity in glaucoma, before and during topical antiglaucoma drug therapy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1991; 39: 85–6.
18. Tozaki M, Fukuma E. Pattern classification of ShearWave™ Elastography images for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant solid breast masses. Acta Radiol. 2011; 52: 1069–75. <https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2011.110276>
19. Friedenwald JS. Tonometer calibration; an attempt to remove discrepancies found in the 1954 calibration scale for Schiotz tonometers. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1957; 61: 108–222.
20. Werner L, Chew J, Mamalis N. Experimental evaluation of ophthalmic devices and solutions using rabbit models. Vet Ophthalmol. 2006; 9: 281–91. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-5224.2006.00495.x>
21. Palte HD, Gayer S, Arrieta E, et al. Are ultrasound-guided ophthalmic blocks injurious to the eye? A comparative rabbit model study of two ultrasound devices evaluating intraorbital thermal and structural changes. Anesth Analg. 2012; 115: 194–201. <https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e318253622e> <PubMed>
front cover

ISSN 1211-4286 (Print) ISSN 1805-9694 (Online)

Open access journal

Archive