Acta Med. 2013, 56: 19-22
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2014.33
COMPARSION THE HISTOPATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS AFTER CERVICAL BIOPSY AND EXCISIONAL PROCEDURES
References
1. P, Ferlay J. Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004. Annals of Oncology 2005, 16: 481–8.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdi098>
2. Mandic A. Seksualno prenosive bolesti, promene na grliću materice i Papanikolau test. Institut za onkologiju Sremska Kamenica, Štamparija Zamurović, 2006: 1–15.
3. Richart RM. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a review. In: Sommers SC, ed. Pathology Annual. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1973: 301–28.
4. X, de Sanjose S. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer – burden and assessment of causality. Nat Cancer Inst Monogr 2003; 31: 3–13.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a003479>
5. S, Aguado MT. Efficacy and other milestones for human papillomavirus vaccine introduction. Vaccine 2004; 23: 569–78.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.07.046>
6. D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2002; 287(16): 2114–9.
<https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.16.2114>
7. V. Kolposkopija i bolesti donjeg genitalnog sistema žene. Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva, Beograd, 2000: 9–15.
8. TC Jr, Massad LS, Dunton CJ, et al. 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcicnoma in situ. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2007 Oct; 11(4): 223–39.
<https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b013e318159408b>
9. JT. Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Lancet 1999 Mar; 353(9156): 857–9.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)00392-4>
10. MF, Tortolero-Luna G, Cook E, et al. A randomized clinical trial of cryotherapy, laser vaporization, and loop electrosurgical excision for treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1998 Nov; 92(5): 737–744.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00246-4>
11. Radiohirurški nož, dr Oppel. http://www.011medicalgroup.rs/radiohirurski _aparat.Html.
12. B. Dijagnostika i lečenje oboljenja cerviksa, vagine i vulve. Elit-Medica, Beograd, 2006; 63–71.
13. Dugandžija T, Mikov Miladinov M. Epidemiological characteristics 1 of cervical cancer in Vojvodina from 1993–2002. Knjiga sažetaka, Simpozijum:Dijagnostika i lječenje raka dojke i vrata maternice, Hrvatska liga protiv raka, Zagreb, 2006; 76.
14. MF, Schottenfeld D, Tortolero-Luna G, Cantor SB, Richards- Kortum R. Colposcopy for the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91(4): 626–31.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00006-4>
15. S, De Nuzzo M, Rubino A, et al. Independent determinants of inaccuracy of colposcopically directed punch biopsy of the cervix. Gynecologic Oncology, 2003; 90: 57–63.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00202-6>
16. R-J, Chang D-Y, Yen M-L, et al. Independent clinical factors which correlate with failures in diagnosing early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1995; 58: 356–61.
<https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1995.1242>
17. W, Singer A, Hill AS. The accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in patients with suspected intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980; 87: 1–4.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1980.tb04416.x>
18. S, Williams SB, Navarro C, Hedriana H, Mushayandebvu T. Diagnostic value of conization of the uterine cervix in the management of cervical neoplasia: a review of 756 consecutive patients. Gynecol Oncol 1992; 47: 287–91.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(92)90128-6>
19. M, Cordaro C, Montanari E, Falcini F, Bucchi L. Diagnosis and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: a registrybased study in the Romagna region of Italy (1986–1993). Int J Epidemiol 1999; 28: 196–203.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/28.2.196>
20. MK, Bury JP. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix. Cytopathology 1998; 9: 93–9.
<https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2303.1998.00094.x>
21. JC, Hanson VW, Abbey K, et al. Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 2006 Aug; 108(2): 264–72.
<https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000220505.18525.85>
22. M, Benedet JL, Atkinson N, et al. The clinical effectiveness of optical spectroscopy for the in vivo diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Where are we? Gynecologic Oncology 2007; 107: S138–S146.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.08.082>
