Acta Med. 2011, 54: 144-148

The Use of Rubber Dam among Czech Dental Practitioners

Martin Kapitán, Zdeňka Šustová

Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Department of Dentistry, Czech Republic

Received June 23, 2011
Accepted October 25, 2011


1. Ahmad IA. Rubber dam usage for endodontic treatment: A review. International Endodontic Journal 2009; 42: 963–72. <>
2. Al-Fouzan KS. A survey of root canal treatment of molar teeth by general dental practitioners in private practice in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dental Journal 2010; 22: 113–7. <> <PubMed>
3. Al-Omari MA, Al-Dwairi ZN. Compliance with infection control programs in private dental clinics in Jordan. Journal of Dental Education 2005; 69: 693–8.
4. Bjorndal L, Reit C. The adoption of new endodontic technology amongst Danish general dental practitioners. International Endodontic Journal 2005; 38: 52–8. <>
5. Czech Dental Chamber. Annual report 2009. Prague, 2010 (released March 2010). (Accessed on June 1, 2011 at /Rocenka_2009_na%20web_komplet.pdf).
6. European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. International Endodontic Journal 2006; 39: 921–30.
7. Filipović J, Jukić S, Miletić I, Pavelić B, Malčić A, Anić I. Patient’s Attitude to Rubber Dam Use. Acta Stomatologica Croatica 2004; 38: 319–22.
8. Gergely EJ. Desmond Greer Walker Award. Rubber dam acceptance. British Dental Journal 1989; 167: 249–52. <>
9. Hill EE , Rubel BS Do Dental Educators Need to Improve Their Approach to Teaching Rubber Dam Use? Journal of Dental Education 2008; 72: 1177–81.
10. Jenkins SM, Hayes SJ, Dummer PMH. A study of endodontic treatment carried out in dental practice within the UK. International Endodontic Journal 2001; 34: 16–22. <>
11. Koch M, Eriksson HG, Axelsson S, Tegelberg Å. Effect of educational intervention on adoption of new endodontic technology by general dental practitioners: a questionnaire survey. International Endodontic Journal 2009; 42: 313–21. <>
12. Koshy S, Chandler NP. Use of rubber dam and its association with other endodontic procedures in New Zealand. New Zealand Dental Journal 2002; 98: 12–6.
13. Lynch CD, McConnell RJ. Attitudes and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners. International Endodontic Journal 2007; 40: 427–32. <>
14. Mala S, Lynch CD, Burke FM, Dummer PMH. Attitudes of final year dental students to the use of rubber dam. International Endodontic Journal 2009; 42: 632–8. <>
15. Marshall K, Page J. The use of rubber dam in the UK. A survey. British Dental Journal 1990; 169: 286–91. <>
16. Onana J, Ngongang A. Hygiene and methods of decontamination, disinfection and sterilization in dental offices in Yaounde. Odonto-stomatologie Tropicale 2002; 25: 45–51.
17. Peciuliene V, Rimkuviene J, Aleksejuniene J, Haapasalo M, Drukteinis S, Maneliene R. Technical aspects of endodontic treatment procedures among Lithuanian general dental practitioners. Stomatologija Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal 2010; 12: 42–50.
18. Slaus G, Bottenberg P. A survey of endodontic practice amongst Flemish dentists. International Endodontic Journal 2002; 35: 759–67. <>
19. Soldani F, Foley J. An assessment of rubber dam usage amongst specialists in paediatric dentistry practising within the UK. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2007; 17: 50–6. <>
20. Stewardson DA, McHugh ES. Patients’ attitudes to rubber dam. International Endodontic Journal 2002; 35: 812–9. <>
21. Udoye CI, Jafarzadeh H. Rubber dam use among a subpopulation of Nigerian dentists. Journal of Oral Science 2010; 52: 245–9. <>
22. Whitworth JM, Seccombe GV, Shoker K, Steele JG. Use of rubber dam and irrigant selection in UK general dental practice. International Endodontic Journal 2000; 33: 435–41. <>
front cover

ISSN 1211-4286 (Print) ISSN 1805-9694 (Online)

Open access journal