Acta Med. 2011, 54: 149-152

https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2016.39

Daily Prostate Volume and Position Monitoring Using Implanted Gold Markers and On-Board Imaging during Radiotherapy

Linda Kašaováa,b, Igor Siráka, Jan Jansaa, Petr Paluskaa, Jiří Peteraa

aCharles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Czech Republic: Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy
bUniversity of Defence, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic

Received May 24, 2011
Accepted October 11, 2011

References

1. Kuban DA, et al., Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized doseescalation trial for prostate cancer. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys. 2008; 70: 67–74. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.054>
2. Zietman AL , et al., Comparison of conventional-dose vs. high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate. JAMA 2005; 294: 1233–1239. <https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.10.1233>
3. Dearnaley DP, et al., Comparison of radiation side-effect of conformal and conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 267–272. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)05180-0>
4. Smitsmans MHP, et al., The influence of a dietary protocol on cone beam CT-guided Radiotherapy for prostate cancer patients. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys. 2008; 71: 1279–1286. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.036>
5. Poulsen PR, et al., Residual set-up errors and margins in on-line image-guided prostate localization in radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology 2007; 85: 201–206. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2007.08.006>
6. Frank SJ, et al., Quantification of prostate and seminal vesicle intrefraction variation during IMRT. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys. 2008; 71: 813–820. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.028>
front cover

ISSN 1211-4286 (Print) ISSN 1805-9694 (Online)

Archive