Acta Med. 2011, 54: 9-12
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2016.10
Comparison of Duplex Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Significant Renal Artery Stenosis
References
1. Detection, evaluation, and treatment of renovascular hypertension. Final report. Working Group on Renovascular Hypertension. Arch Intern Med 1987; 147(5):820–9.
2. F, Venturini M, Vanzulli A et al. Renal arterial stenosis: prospective comparison of color Doppler US and breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 2000; 214(2):373–80.
<https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.214.2.r00fe14373>
3. S, Nadja C. Captopril renography and duplex Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13(2):313–7.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ndt.a027824>
4. P, van Jaarsveld BC, Steyerberg EW, Man in ‘t Veld AJ, Schalekamp MA, Habbema JD. A clinical prediction rule for renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129(9):705–11.
<https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-129-9-199811010-00005>
5. A, Schocke M, Judmaier W et al. 3D MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison of volume rendering and maximum intensity projection algorithms. Radiology 2002; 223(2):509–16.
<https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2231010858>
6. JW, Piedmonte MR, Young JR, DeAnna S, Grubb M, Childs MB. The Utility of Duplex Ultrasound Scanning of the Renal Arteries for Diagnosing Significant Renal Artery Stenosis. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122(11):833–8.
<https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-122-11-199506010-00004>
7. ST, Mills JL Sr, Tynan-Cuisinier G, Goshima KR, Westerband A, Hughes JD. The limitations of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: comparative analysis with conventional arteriography. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41(3):462–8.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2004.12.045>
8. C, Vlychou M, Vassiou K et al. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography. Ren Fail 2007; 29(3):295–302.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/08860220601166305>
9. JH, Sacks D, Kent KC et al. Guidelines for the Reporting of Renal Artery Revascularization in Clinical Trials. Circulation 2002; 106(12):1572–85.
<https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000029805.87199.45>
10. RD, Textor SC. Renal-Artery Stenosis. N Engl J Med 2001; 344(6):431–42.
<https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200102083440607>
11. SO, Rieger J, Weber CH et al. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US. Radiology 2005; 235(2):687–98.
<https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2352031693>
12. AN, Bis KG, Kirsch M, Weintraub J, Laub G. Contrast-enhanced breathhold three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of renal arteries: optimization of technique and pitfalls. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12(6):912–23.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2586(200012)12:6<912::AID-JMRI15>3.0.CO;2-A>
13. GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, Kroon AA, de Leeuw PW, van Engelshoven JM. Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135(6):401–11.
<https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-135-6-200109180-00009>
14. GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG et al. Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141(9):674–82.
<https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-141-9-200411020-00007>
15. GJ, Macaskill P, Chan SF. Comparative Accuracy of Renal Duplex Sonographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Renal Artery Stenosis: Paired and Unpaired Analysis. AJR 2007; 188(3):798–811.
<https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.0355>
