Acta Med. 2006, 49: 203-207
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2017.133
PAR Index in the Evaluation of the Stability of the Orthodontic Treatment Results. A Review
References
1. A, Feghali R, Hans MG, Nelson S. Assessment of orthodontically untreated adolescents using the PAR index. J Dent Res 1996; 75 (AADR Abstract): 363.
2. A, Nelson S, Feghali R, Hans MG. Assessment of orthodontically untreated sample using the PAR index. J Dent. Res 1995; 74 (AADR Abstracts): 139.
3. L F. The six keys to normal occlusion. Amer J Orthodont dentofacial Orthop 1972; 62: 296–309.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(72)90268-0>
4. R, Fredlund A. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment results. Eur J Orthodont 1981; 3: 181–5.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/3.3.181>
5. P, Shaw W. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthodont 1989; 11: 309–20.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a035999>
6. I B, Shaw WC, Richmond S, O’Brien KD, Andrews M. A comparison of the reliability and validity of the PAR index and Summers’ occlusal index. Eur J Orthodont 1993; 18: 27–31.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/15.1.27>
7. TN, Buschang MA, Alexander RG. Long term stability of class II div I non -extraction cervical face bow therapy: I model analysis. Amer J Orthod dentofac Orthop 1996; 109: 271–6.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70150-6>
8. D. A method of evaluating the efficiency of orthodontic treatment. Transactions of the European Orthodontic Society 1974; 223–32.
9. NA. The first 100 cases: a personal audit of orthodontic treatment assessed by the PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) Index. Brit Dent J 1993; 174: 290–7.
<https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808157>
10. AM, Rock WP. An appraisal of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index and a suggested new weighting system. Eur J Orthodont 1999; 21: 181–92.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/21.2.181>
11. JH. Directional edgewise orthodontic approach. Journal of Clinical Orthodont 1975; 9: 143–54.
12. WJS, Buchanan IB. Use of the PAR Index in Assessing the Effectiveness of Removable Orthodontic Appliances. Brit J Orthodont 1993; 20: 351–7.
<https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.20.4.351>
13. RM. Stability and relapse of dental arch alignment: review article. Brit J Orthodont 1990; 17: 235–41.
<https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.17.3.235>
14. RM, Riedal RA, Stein A. Mandibular arch length increase during the mixed dentition, post retention evaluation of stability and relapse. Amer J Orthod dentofac Orthop 1990; 97: 393–404.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(08)70111-O>
15. RS, Nanda SK. Considerations of dentofacial growth in long -term retention and stability, an active retention needed. Amer J Orthodont dentofac Orthop 1992; 101: 297–302.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80321-X>
16. K, Robbins R, Vig KWL, Shnorhokian H, Weyant RJ. The effectiveness of Class II, Division 1 treatment. Amer J Orthodont. Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 107: 329–34.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70149-4>
17. OD, Jones SR. Long-term evaluation of treated Class II Division 1 malocclusion utilizing the PAR index. Brit J Orthodont 1995; 22: 171–8.
<https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.22.2.171>
18. S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, Andrews W. The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): Methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthodont 1992; 14: 180–7.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/14.3.180>
19. S, Andrews M. Orthodontic Treatment Standards in Norway. Eur J Orthodont 1993; 15: 7–15.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/15.1.7>
20. Richmond S, O’Brien KD, Buchanan IB, Burden DJ. An introduction to Occlusal Indices, University of Manchester, Bradford, England, Ortho-Care (UK) Ltd. 1994.
21. WC, Richmond S, O’Brien KD and Brook PH. Quality control in orthodontics: Indices of treatment need and treatment standards. Brit Dent J 1991; 170: 107–112.
<https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4807429>
22. M, Kotas M, Machytkova G, Gvuzdova K. Effectiveness of orthodontic treatment with removable and fixed appliances. Ortodoncie 2004; 4: 21–31.
