Acta Med. 2003, 46: 15-18
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2019.3
Effect of Photorefractive Keratectomy and Laser in situ Keratomileusis in High Myopia on logMAR Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity
References
1. Ophthalmol 1999; 106:447–57.
< A, Salah T, Waring GO et al. Randomized bilateral comparison of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for 2.5 to 8.00 diopters of myopia. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90102-1>
2. Am J Ophthalmol 1982; 94:91–6.
< FL, Krasoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey I. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(82)90197-0>
3. Refract-Corneal-Surg 1993; 9:293–9.
W, Beck R, Busse H. Design and development of a new 193-nm excimer laser surgical system.
4. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111:1627–34.
< J, Binder PS, Kassar BS, Nordan LT. The correction of high myopia using the excimer laser. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1993.01090120049021>
5. J Refract Surg 1996; 12:417–22.
SA, Salah A, Badawy TT et al. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia between 6.00 and 10.00 diopters.
6. Ophthalmol 1998; 105: 1512–23.
< PS, Brint SF, Maloney RK et al. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(98)98038-1>
7. J Cat Refr Surg 1999; 25(5):663–9.
< JT, Dudeja DR, Chang J. Functional vision and corneal changes after laser in situ keratomileusis determined by contrast sensitivity, glare testing and corneal topography. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(99)00011-5>
8. Ophthalmologe 1999; 96(11):711–6.
< MC, Hugger P, Jendritzka B, Liermann A. Dammerungssehvermogen nach Myopiekorrektur mittels LASIK (Twilling visual acuity after correction of myopia with LASIK). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003470050482>
9. Cesk Slov Ophthalmol 1996; 52:52–7.
H, Hejcmanová D, Peregrin J. Reproducibility of contrast sensitivity measurements.
10. Cesk Slov Ophthalmol 1996; 5:58–63.
H, Hejcmanová D, Peregrin J. How to measure visual acuity?
11. Ophthalmol 2000; 107(10):1864–7.
< S, McDonald MB, Scheinblum KA et al. Contrast sensitivity evaluation after laser in situ keratomileusis. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00355-9>
12. J Cat Refr Surg. 2001; 27(3):357–61.
< K, Bissen-Miyajima H, Toda I et al. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis correction on contrast visual acuity. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00745-8>
13. Ophthalmol. 1997; 81:136–40.
U, Businger U, Hartmann P et al. Glare sensitivity and visual acuity after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.
14. Cesk Slov Ophthalmol 1999; 55:48.
J, Hejcmanová D, Kalinová M, Svěrák J. Czech norm for visual acuity testing.
15. J Cat Refr Surg 1998; 24:183–9.
< JJ, Sakla, HF, Alió JL. Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80198-3>
16. Ophthalmol 1993; 100:1335–45.
< LW, Matta CS, Deitz MR et al. Excimer photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(13)31819-3>
17. Ophthalmol 2000; 107:251–7.
< M, Payette Y. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis. A control matched study. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00043-3>
18. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110:935–43.
< NA, Barak M, Daya S et al. Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy in high myopia, a multicentr. Study. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1992.01080190041027>
19. J Cat Refr Surg 1994; 10 (Suppl.):178–87.
K, Amano S, Tanaka S. Photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. One year follow up in 97 eyes.
20. Clin Vis Sci 1993; 8:401–15.
RL, Thomson WD. A comparison of psychometric methods for measuring the contrast sensitivity of experienced observers.