Acta Med. 2002, 45: 167-171
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2019.75
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Deproteinized Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss®) and Impladent® Dental Implant System Part II. Evaluation of Deprotienized Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss®) and Implant Surface
Individual author index pages
Other articles of these authors
-
Soft Tissue Esthetics in Implant Dentistry
Rakesh V. Somanathan, Antonín Šimůnek, Josef Bukač, Tomáš Brázda, Dana Kopecká
2007, Vol. 50, Issue 3, pp. 183-186 -
Evaluation of the Success of β-Tricalciumphosphate and Deproteinized Bovine Bone in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Histomorphometry: A Review
Rakesh V. Somanathan, Antonín Šimůnek
2006, Vol. 49, Issue 2, pp. 87-89 -
Aesthetics in Implantology
Rakesh V. Somanathan, Antonín Šimůnek
2006, Vol. 49, Issue 1, pp. 19-22 -
One-Stage Maxillary Sinus Grafting Using a Modified Surgical Concept
Samer Kasabah, Antonín Šimůnek
2004, Vol. 47, Issue 2, pp. 137-139 -
Influence of Discoplasty and Discectomy of the Temporomandibular Joint on Elimination of Pain and Restricted Mouth Opening
Jiří Krug, Zdeněk Jirousek, Helena Šuchmová, Eva Čermáková
2004, Vol. 47, Issue 1, pp. 47-53 -
Two Ways of Immediate Rehabilitation of Edentulous Mandible with Dental Implants and Prostheses – Critical View on Brånemark System® Novum
Jiří Krug, Radek Mounajjed
2003, Vol. 46, Issue 4, pp. 205-212 -
Can We Predict Maxillary Sinus Mucosa Perforation?
Samer Kasabah, Jiří Krug, Antonín Šimůnek, Miguel Cevallos Lecaro
2003, Vol. 46, Issue 1, pp. 19-23 -
Evaluation of the Accuracy of Panoramic Radiograph in the Definition of Maxillary Sinus Septa
Samer Kasabah, Radovan Slezák, Antonín Šimůnek, Jiří Krug, Miguel Cevallos Lecaro
2002, Vol. 45, Issue 4, pp. 173-175 -
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Deproteinized Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss®) and Impladent® Dental Implant System Part I. Comparison Between One-Stage and Two-Stage Procedure
Samer Kasabah, Antonín Šimůnek, Jiří Krug, Miguel Cevallos Lecaro
2002, Vol. 45, Issue 3, pp. 115-118