Acta Med. 2002, 45: 167-171

https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2019.75

Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Deproteinized Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss®) and Impladent® Dental Implant System Part II. Evaluation of Deprotienized Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss®) and Implant Surface

Samer Kasabah, Antonín Šimůnek, Jiří Krug, Miguel Cevallos Lecaro

Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Department of Dentistry, Centre of Dental Implantology, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic

Received April 1, 2002
Accepted September 1, 2002

References

1. Consensus statement, Academy of Osseointegration Sinus Graft Consensus Conference, The Centre for Executive Educatin, Babson College, Welleslay, MA, Nov. 16–17, 1996.
2. Denissen HW, Groot DK, Makkes PC, Hoof VDA, Klopper PJ. Tissue response to dense apatite implants in rats. J Biomed Mater Res 1980; 14:713–21. <https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820140603>
3. Fugazzotto PA. Sinus floor augmentation at the time of maxillary molar extraction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14:536–42.
4. Hall HD, McKenna SJ. Bone graft of the maxillary sinus for Brĺnemark implants. A preliminary report. Oral & Maxillofac Clin North Am 1991; 3:869–75.
5. Hallman M, Cederlund A, Lindskog S, Lundegren S, Sennerby L. A clinical histologic study of bovine hydroxyapatite in combination with autogenous bone and fibrin glue for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Results after 6 to 8 months of healing. Clin Oral Impl Res 2001; 12:135–43. <https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002135.x>
6. Iwamoto Y. Nationwide survey of bone grafting performed from 1980 through 1989 in Japan. Clin Orthop 1997; 335:292. <https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199702000-00031>
7. Jensen SS, Aaboe M, Pinholt EM, Hjorting-Hansen E, Melsen F, Ruyter IE. Tissue reaction and material characteristics of four bone substitutes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11:55–66.
8. Kent JN, Block MS. Simultaneous maxillary sinus floor bone grafting and placement of hydroxyapatite coated implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989; 47:238–42. <https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(89)90225-5>
9. Klinge B, Alberius P, Isaksson S, Johansson J. Osseous response to implanted natural bone mineral and synthetic hydroxyapatite ceramic in the repair of experimental skull bone defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 50:241–9. <https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(92)90320-Y>
10. Misch CE. Maxillary sinus augmentation for endosteal implants: organized alternative treatment plans. International. J Oral Implantology 1987; 4:49–58.
11. Moy PK, Lundgren S, Holmes RE. Maxillary sinus augmentation: histomorphometric analysis of graft materials for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 51:857–62. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80103-X>
12. Peetz M. Characterization of xenogenic bone material. In: Boyne PJ(ed). Osseous reconstruction of the maxilla and the mandible. Chicago: Quintessence, 1997:87–100.
13. Quińones CR, Hüzreler MB, Schüpbach P et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and osseointegrated dental implants in monkeys. Part II. Evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite as a grafting material. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997; 8:487–96. <https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080607.x>
14. Raghoebar GM, Brouwer TJ, Reintsema H. Augmentation of maxillary sinus floor with autogenous bone for placement of endosseous implants: A preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51:1198–203. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80288-5>
15. Skoglund A, Hising P, Young C. A clinical and histologic examination in humans of the osseous response to implanted natural bone mineral. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12:194–9.
16. Small SA, Zinner ID, Panno FV, Shapiro HJ, Stein JI. Augmenting the maxillary sinus for implants: Report of 27 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8:523–8.
17. Smiler DG, Holmes RE. Sinus lift procedure using porous hydroxyapatite: A preliminary clinical report. J Oral Implantol 1987; 13:239–53.
18. Smiler DG, Johnson PW, Lozada JL et al. Sinus lift grafts and endosseous implants: Treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla. Dent Clin North Am 1992; 36:151–88.
19. Tatum OH. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstruction. Dent Clin North Am 1986; 30:207–29.
20. Valentini P, Abensur D, Densari D, Graziani JN, Hämmerle CHF. Histological elevation of Bio-Oss® in a 2–stage sinus floor elevation and implantation procedure. A human case report. Clin Oral Impl Res 1998; 9:59–64. <https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090108.x>
21. Yildirim M, Spiekermann H, Biesterfeld S, Edelhoff D. Maxillary sinus augmentation using xenogenic bone substitute material Bio-Oss® in combination with venous blood. A histologic and histomorphometric study in humans. Clin Oral Impl Res 2000; 11:217–29. <https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011003217.x>
22. Zitzmann NU, Scharer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla: Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg. Med. Pathol. Endod; 1998; 85:8–17. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90391-2>
23. Zitzmann NU, Naef R, Scharer P. Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss® for guided bone regeneration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12:100–9.
front cover

ISSN 1211-4286 (Print) ISSN 1805-9694 (Online)

Open access journal

Archive