Acta Med. 2001, 44: 131-134

https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2019.99

Electrophysiological Testing of Dyslexia

Miroslav Kubaa, Jana Szanyia, David Gayera, Jan Kremláčeka, Zuzana Kubováb

aCharles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Department of Pathophysiology, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
bCharles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Department of Physiology, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic

Received September 1, 2001
Accepted November 1, 2001

References

1. Bach M, Ullrich D. Contrast dependency of motion-onset and pattern-reversal VEPs: Interaction of stimulus type, recording site and response component. Vision Res 1997; 37:1845-9. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00317-3>
2. Barnard N, Crewther SG, Crewther DP. Development of a magnocellular function in good and poor primary school-age readers. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75:62-8. <https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199801000-00026>
3. Bartlett MS. Smoothing periodograms from time-series with continuous spectra. Nature 1948; 161:686-7. <https://doi.org/10.1038/161686a0>
4. Demb JB, Boynton GM, Heeger DJ. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of early visual pathways in dyslexia. J. Neurosci 1998; 18:6939-51. <https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-17-06939.1998> <PubMed>
5. Greatrex JC, Drasdo N. The magnocellular deficit hypothesis in dyslexia: a review of reported evidence. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1995; 15:501-6. <https://doi.org/10.1016/0275-5408(95)00090-Z>
6. Harmony T, Hinojosa G, Marosi E et al. Correlation between EEG spectral parameters and an educational evaluation. Intern J Neuroscience 1990; 54:147-55. <https://doi.org/10.3109/00207459008986630>
7. Johannes S, Kussmaul CL, Muente TF, Mangun GR. Developmental dyslexia: passive visual stimulation provides no evidence for a magnocellular processing defect. Neuropsychologia 1996; 34:1123-7. <https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(96)00026-7>
8. Kuba M, Kubová Z. Visual evoked potentials specific for motion-onset. Doc Ophthalmol 1992; 80:83-9. <https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00161234>
9. Kubová Z, Kuba M, Spekreijse H, Blakemore C. Contrast dependence of motiononset and pattern-reversal evoked potentials. Vision Res 1995a; 35:197-205. <https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(94)00138-C>
10. Kubová Z, Kuba M, Peregrin J, Nováková V. Visual evoked potential evidence for magnocellular system deficit in dyslexia. Physiol Res 1995b; 44:87-9.
11. Solan HA. The effects of varying luminance and wavelength on reading ability in good and poor readers: Is there a transient sytem deficit? Am Opt Assoc meeting, New Orleans, January 1996.
12. Solman RT, Dain SJ, Lim HS, May JG. Reading-related wavelength and spatial frequency effects in visual spatial location. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1995; 15:125-32. <https://doi.org/10.1016/0275-5408(95)98242-F>
13. Richardson AJ. Handedness and visual motion sensitivity in adult dyslexics. The Irish J Psychol 1995; 16:229-47. <https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.1995.10558059>
14. Victor JD, Conte MM, Burton L, Nass RD. Visual evoked potentials in dyslexics and normals: failure to find a difference in transient or steady-state responses. Visual Neurosci 1993; 10:939-46. <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952523800006155>
15. Wilkins A, Milroy R, Nommo-Smith I et al. Preliminary observations concerning treatment of visual discomfort and associated perceptual distortion. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1992; 12:257-63. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.1992.tb00302.x>
16. Williams MC, Lecluyse K, Rock-Faucheux A. Effective interventions for reading disability. J Am Optom Assoc 1992; 63:411-7. <https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199205000-00010>
front cover

ISSN 1211-4286 (Print) ISSN 1805-9694 (Online)

Open access journal

Archive