Acta Med. 1999, 42: 19-23
https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2019.141
Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance Versus Thermodilution in Patients Post Open-Heart Surgery
References
1. WC, Wo CC, Bishop MH et al. Multicenter trial of a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance device for cardiac output estimation. Crit Care Med 1994; 22(12):1907-12.
<https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199412000-00004>
2. WC, Wo CC, Bishop MH et al. Noninvasive physiologic monitoring of high-risk surgical patients. Arch Surg 1996; 131(7):732-7.
<https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430190054014>
3. MH, Shoemaker WC, Shulesko J, Wo CC. Noninvasive cardiac index monitoring in gunshot wound victims. Acad Emerg Med 1996; 3(7):682-8.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03490.x>
4. R, Ciampani N, Costantini C, Blandini A, Purcaro A. Comparison of impedance cardiography with thermodilution and direct Fick methods for noninvasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac output during incremental exercise in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77(15):1293-301.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(97)89153-9>
5. BD, McCarthy RJ, Tuman KJ, Ivankovich AD. Bioimpedance hemodynamics compared to pulmonary artery catheter monitoring during orthotopic liver transplantation. J Surg Res 1993; 54(1):52-6.
<https://doi.org/10.1006/jsre.1993.1009>
6. DB, Findlay IN, Wilson J, Henderson E, Dargie HJ. Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography and electrical bioimpedance. Br Heart J 1990; 63:93-7.
<https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.63.2.93>
<PubMed>
7. G, Saino A, Lotto A. Valutazione non invasiva dell'indice cardiaco e della frazione di eiezione nella cardiopatia ischemica. Confronto tra bioimpedenza toracica, termodiluizione e cineventricolografia. Minerva Cardioangiol 1992; 40(6):203-9 (abstract).
8. G, Molter G, Helms J, Niedermark I, Altmayer P. Determination of cardiac output during positive end-expiratory pressure - non-invasive electrical bioimpedance compared with standard thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1990; 18(5):544-6.
<https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199005000-00017>
9. TV, Norman K, Reynolds R, Covington D, Maxwell JG J. Cardiac output measurement in critical care patients: Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance versus thermodilution. Trauma. 1991; 31(8):1116-20.
<https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199131080-00011>
10. C, Reichenspurner H, Fulle P, Nollert G, Reichart B J. Registration of thoracic electrical bioimpedance for early diagnosis of rejection after heart transplantation. Heart-Lung-Transplant 1993; 12(5):832-6.
11. MM, Demain AD. Cardiac output measurement: lack of agreement between thermodilution and thoracic electric bioimpedance in two clinical settings. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7(3):182-5.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0952-8180(94)00050-E>
12. S, Calloway E, Cairo J, Granger W, Winslow J. Comparison of cardiac output measurements by thermodilution and thoracic electrical bioimpedance in critically ill versus non-critically ill patients. Am J Emerg Med 1995; 13(6):626-31.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-6757(95)90045-4>
13. MA, Hamilton M, Stevenson LW, Vredevoe DL. Comparison of thermodilution and transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac outputs. Heart Lung 1991; 20(4):357-62.
14. L, Lum E, Dracup K, Friedman A. Predictors of between-method differences in cardiac output measurement using thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1995; 23(10):1667-73.
<https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199510000-00010>
15. AN, Ryan J, Doran BR, Pollard BJ. Bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement: the Bomed NCCOM3 after coronary bypass surgery. Intensive Care Med 1991; 17(7):383-6.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01720674>
16. DR, Schmid ER, Tornic M et al. Noninvasive versus invasive assessment of cardiac output after cardiac surgery: clinical validation. Cardiothorac Anesth 1990; 4(1):46-59.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0888-6296(90)90447-N>
17. WS, Amundson DE. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output in postaortocoronary bypass patients. Crit Care Med 1993; 21(8):1139-42.
<https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199308000-00011>
18. S, D'Alto M, Maddalena G et al. Utilita della bioimpedenza nel monitoraggio del paziente in unita di terapia intensiva di cardiochirurgia: comparazione con la termodiluizione. Cardiologia. 1993; 38(9):577-83.
19. V, Slezák J, Haruštiaková D et al. Komplexné porovnanie využiteľnosti a stanovenie limitácií neinvazívnej bioimpedančnej metódy s invazívnou termodilučnou metódou v hemodynamickom sledovaní dospelých kardiochirurgických pacientov I - II. Noninvasiv Cardiol 1994; 3(2):115-34.
20. NM, Napoli D, McNulty S, Torjman M, Audu P. Intraoperative comparison of a new thoracic bioimpedance device to thermodilution and echo for the determination of cardiac output. Anesth Analg 1997; 84, SCA1-SCA127.
<https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199704000-00037>
21. JD, McQuillan P. Comparison of thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution for the measurement of cardiac index in patients with severe sepsis. Br J Anaesth 1993; 70(1):58-62.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/70.1.58>
22. C, Sear JW, Verhoeff F, Sanders DJ, Foex P. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance: a study of reproducibility and comparison with thermodilution. Br J Anaesth 1991; 67(6):788-94.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/67.6.788>
23. Darovic GO. Hemodynamic Monitoring: Invasive and Noninvasive Clinical Application. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W B Saunders, 1995:253-341.
24. Máttar JA, Batista ML, Ribeiro E, Tavares JR, Petrizzo A, Buffolo E. Application of bedside nonivasive method of body impedance analysis to assess changes in pre and postoperative period of cardiac surgery. Presented at VII. World Congress of Cardiology, Rio de Janeiro, 1998.
