Acta Med. 2023, 66: 138-145

https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2024.8

Current Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Strategy for General Practitioners in Emergency Department

Joshua Eldad Frederich Lasanudina, Sidhi Laksonob,c, Hillary Kusharsamitad

aFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
bDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Central Pertamina Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
cFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof Dr Hamka, Tangerang, Indonesia
dFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia

Received September 17, 2022
Accepted January 10, 2024

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a disease with a relatively good prognosis when diagnosed and treated properly. This review aims to analyse available data and combine them into algorithms that physicians can use in the emergency department for quick decision-making in diagnosing and treating PE. The available data show that PE can be excluded through highly sensitive clinical decision rules, i.e. Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria (PERC), Wells criteria, and Revised Geneva criteria, combined with D-dimer assessment. In cases where PE could not be excluded through the mentioned strategies, imaging modalities, such as compression ultrasonography (CUS), computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA), and planar ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scan, are indicated for a definite diagnosis. Once a diagnosis has been made, treatment of PE depends on its mortality risk as patients are divided into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk cases. High-risk cases are treated for their hemodynamic instability, given parenteral or oral anticoagulant therapy, and are indicated for reperfusion therapy. Intermediate-risk PE is only given parenteral or oral anticoagulants and reperfusion is indicated when anticoagulants fail. Low-risk cases are given oral anticoagulants and based on the Hestia criteria, patients may be discharged and treated as outpatients.

References

50 live references